Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 9;14(2):1855–1865. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6367

Table III.

Summary of results.

Parameter Studies, n Study design Case/control OR (95% CI) P-value P-value of heterogeneity I2, % P-valuea
Total 24 Case-control 971/1085 2.27 (1.40–3.69) 0.001 0.022 43.0
HPV DNA methods NA
  PCR 22 Case-control 945/1015 2.27 (1.40–3.69) 0.001 0.022 43.0
  No PCR   2 Case-control 26/70 NA NA NA NA
Year of publication 0.53
  1990–1999 13 Case-control 440/423 1.92 (0.85–4.35) 0.117 0.046 47.7
  2000–2015 11 Case-control 531/662 2.65 (1.47–4.87) 0.001 0.113 37.0
Geographical region 0.08
  Asia   8 Case-control 459/539 2.96 (1.56–5.64) 0.001 0.257 22.6
  Europe   7 Case-control 213/236 2.29 (1.17–4.47) 0.015 0.457 0.0
  North America   6 Case-control 197/205 1.05 (0.47–2.36) 0.904 0.298 18.6
  South America   1 Case-control 41/30 43.57 (2.49–761.57) 0.010 NA NA
  Oceania   2 Case-control 61/21 1.84 (0.09–38.67) 0.694 0.018 82.8
Type of tissue 0.21
  Frozen 12 Case-control 385/435 1.62 (0.75–3.74) 0.216 0.052 48.0
  Formalin-fixed 12 Case-control 586/650 2.98 (1.68–5.30) 0.000 0.184 27.3
a

Stratified pooled analyses were used to assess the subgroup differences. OD, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available; HPV, human papillomavirus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.