Table 2.
Walking | MVPA | Sedentary behaviour | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participation (yes/no) | Minutes per week | Participation (yes/no) | Minutes per week | Minutes per day | ||||
Exposure | N | OR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | N | OR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | N | B (95% CI) |
Area: New motorway (South) (Reference: no motorway (North)) | 248 | 0.68 (0.24, 1.89) | 0.82 (0.62,1.10) | 214 | 0.60 (0.25, 1.43) | 0.94 (0.68, 1.31) | 215 | 52.46 (−15.70, 120.62) |
Proximity within study area with new motorway | 88 | 1.54 (0.24, 9.70) | 1.27 (0.86,1.89) | 70 | 2.39 (0.49, 11.65) | 1.27 (0.76, 2.12) | 81 | −40.17 (−125.38, 45.05) |
Area: Existing motorway (East) (Reference: no motorway (North)) | 248 | 0.57 (0.19, 1.68) | 1.07 (0.79,1.47) | 214 | 0.37 (0.15, 0.91) | 0.89 (0.62, 1.27) | 215 | 39.39 (−33.48, 112.27) |
Proximity within study area with existing motorway | 69 | 1.55 (0.32, 7.52) | 1.03 (0.71,1.50) | 59 | 0.30 (0.09, 0.97) | 0.77 (0.46, 1.29) | 59 | 59.41 (−26.91, 145.73) |
Bold values represent statistically significant associations (p < 0.05). MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, OR odds ratio, IRR incidence rate ratio, B beta, CI confidence interval
Proximity was defined as the negative of the natural logarithm of the road network distance in metres from the weighted population centroid of the unit postcode of residence to the nearest motorway junction. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, home ownership, car ownership, work status and time lived in neighbourhood