Table 6. Summary from primary studies of isolated mandibular advancement osteotomies#.
Primary studies | Paticipants (M:F) |
Mean Age (Range) years old |
Maximum follow-up period | Imaging method | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Archilleos et al., 2000[1] | 20(20:-) | 26.27(17.33–43.58) | PO 3 years | Ceph |
|
Eggensperger et al.,2005[4] | 15(4:11) | 21(17–31) | PO 12 years | Ceph |
|
Hernandez-Alfaro et al., 2011[2] | 10 | * | Mean:PO121.4 days | CBCT |
|
Kochel et al., 2013 | 102(27:75) | 31.8 | PO 5 weeks | CBCT |
|
Turnbull et al., 2000 | 8 | * | PO 6 weeks | Ceph |
|
# All isolated mandibular advancement osteotomies here were bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO).
* Unable to be determined asthe study also involve other groups with different surgical procedures.
Abbreviations: M = male; F = female; Ceph = cephalometric; CBCT = con beam computed tomography; PA = pharyngeal airway; OP = oropharyngx; NP = nasopharynx; UPA = upper pharyngeal airway; MPA = middle pharyngeal airway; LPA = lower pharyngeal airway; pre-op = pre-operative; PO = post-operative.