Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181958

Fig 9.

Fig 9

Comparison of the dose profiles among the proposed method (solid lines), the method of Micke A et al. (dotted lines) and the Matrixx results (*) for doses of 48 (a), 176 (b) and 415 (c) cGy.