Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 25;243:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.093

Table 3.

Odds of MSIMI using PAT ratio, hemodynamic reactivity, and RPP.

OR (95%CI)* p value*
Bivariate analyses
 RPP response, ≥ vs < cutoff 1.8 (1.1 – 2.8) <0.001
 PAT ratio, < vs ≥ cutoff 2.1 (1.3 – 3.3) 0.003
 CSIMI 7.1 (4.2 – 11.9) <0.001
Multivariate analysis 1
 RPP response, ≥ vs < cutoff 2.0 (1.2 – 3.4) 0.007
 PAT ratio, < vs ≥ cutoff 2.0 (1.2 – 3.3) 0.011
 CSIMI 7.2 (4.2 – 12.3) <0.001
Multivariate analysis 2
 RPP response, ≥ vs < cutoff 2.2 (1.3 – 3.8) 0.005
 PAT ratio, < vs ≥ cutoff 1.8 (1.1 – 3.1) 0.026
 CSIMI 7.3 (4.2 – 12.7) <0.001
*

OR and P values were derived from logistic regression analyses.

RPP response cutoff is 4402 beat x mmHg / min.

PAT ratio cutoff is 0.68.

Multivariate analysis 1: RPP response, PAT ratio and CSIMI were all included in one model as predictors of MSIMI.

Multivariate analysis 2: Multivariate analysis 1 + adjustment for age, gender, race, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, beta blocker use and resting RPP.

Abbreviations: OR: odds ratio. CI: confidence interval. RPP: rate pressure product. PAT: peripheral arterial tonometry. CSIMI: Conventional stress induced myocardial ischemia.