Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 May 8;17(8):483–494. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.38

Table 1.

Current methods for identifying genetically foreign microchimeric cells

Technique Target Advantages Disadvantages
DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • DNA encoding unique MHC haplotype alleles

  • Y chromosome DNA (to identify microchimeric male cells in females)

  • Other genetic polymorphisms such as insertion and deletions or minor alloantigens (for example, Rhesus factor or killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors)

  • High sensitivity

  • High specificity

  • Wide variety of potential targets for discriminating microchimeric cells

  • Precludes isolation of intact, live cells

  • Pre-screening of individuals is required to identity unique DNA targets such as MHC haplotypes

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
  • Y chromosome DNA-containing cells (to identify microchimeric male cells in females)

  • Cells containing two X chromosomes (to identify microchimeric female cells in males)

  • When combined with fluorescence microscopy, FISH allows detection of rare cells within intact tissues with high sensitivity and specificity

  • Precludes isolation of intact, live cells

  • Primarily allows identification of gender-discordant cells

  • Limited analysis of other molecular parameters

Flow cytometry
  • Unique MHC haplotype alleles

  • Discordant reporter constructs (such as green fluorescent protein or luciferase)

  • Congenic cell surface antigens (such as CD45 alleles)

  • Analysis of cell associated molecular and phenotypical markers

  • Purification of intact live cells to further investigate their function

  • Low specificity (high background)

  • Requires antibodies against each molecular target