Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 30;25(4):259–266. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-20

Table 3: Frequency distribution of microleakage in the dentin margin.

Study group Number Degree of microleakage
Grade zero Number (%) Grade one Number (%) Grade two Number (%) Grade three Number (%)
Control 15 8 (53.3%) 1 (6.7%) 4 (26.7%) 2 (13.3%)
Gluma® 15 9 (60%) 3 (20%) 2 (13.3%) 1 (6.7%)
CO2 laser 15 7 (46.7%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.7%) 7 (46.7%)
Er:YAG laser 15 3 (20%) 0 (0%) 4 (26.7%) 8 (53.3%)