Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 15;7(7):84. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7070084

Table A1.

Summary of structural neuroimaging studies of hallucinating patients with LBD. Only main results related to VH are reported.

Study Sample Age 1 Disease Duration (years) 1 VH MMSE 1 H&Y Neuroimaging Methods—VH Main Results:
Neuroimaging and VH
Blanc et al. (2016) [26] 28 pro-DLB 67.5 (9.2) NA 60.7% DLB patients 27.6 (2.1) NA Whole brain VBM
Covariates: age, TIV, sex, group comparison
Grey matter volume
p ≤ 0.005 uncorrected
VH < NVH: L cuneus
27 pro-AD 69.3 (7.8) 26.9 (1.9)
33 HC 72.4 (10.4) 29.4 (0.9)
Delli Pizzi et al. (2016) [41] 19 DLB VH 76.37 (4.35) 2.95 (0.91) NPI 18.00 (4.83) NA ROI MRI
ROIs: hippocampal substructures; covariates: age, ed., TIV; relationship with NPIhall
Grey matter volume
Correlation with NPIhall: NS
15 AD 76.47 (7.17) 3.00 (0.93) 16.73 (6.31)
19 HC 76.21 (4.49) - 27.58 (0.69)
Delli Pizzi et al. (2014) [43] 18 DLB VH 75.4 (4.0) 2 2.9 (0.6) 2 NPI 19.1 (2.6) 3,4 NA Cortical thickness
Covariates: MMSE, CAF, and UPDRS; correlation with NPIhall (entire cortex and ROI where DLB ≠ AD)
Cortical thickness
p < 0.05 corrected
DLB VH < HC: bilat. pericalcarine, LG, cuneus, precuneus, SPG
Correlation with NPIhall: R precuneus and SPG
15 AD 75.6 (7.6) 3.1 (0.6) 18.3 (4.1)
14 HC 75.5 (5.3) - 28.1 (1.6)
Delli Pizzi et al. (2014) [45] 15 DLB VH 76.3 (4.1) 2 2.9 (7) 2 NPI 17.7 (5.2) 4,5 NA DTI ROI
Tractography-based subdivision of the thalami; nuisance factors: MMSE, CAF, and UPDRS; correlation with NPIhall
Grey matter MD
DLB VH > HC: thalamic sub-regions project. to PFC and parieto-occipital cortex bilaterally; R thalamic region project. to amygdala; L thalamic region project. to motor cortex
Positive association with NPIhall: R thalamus to parietal (VH freq. and sev.) and occipital cortices (VH sev.)
15 AD 76.1 (4.9) 3.1 (6) 16.7 (5.4)
13 HC 76.0 (4.2) - 28.3 (1.5)
Franciotti et al. (2015) [16] 15 sPD VH 70 (6) 2 11.3 (4.3) 6,7 NPI and semi-structured interview 24.3 (2.2) 2 3.0 (0.5) 7 Cortical thickness
Analysis within DMN cortical regions; nuisance factor: age; group comparison
Resting-state fMRI 8
Cortical thicknesss
sPD VH vs. sPD NVH: NS
sPD VH < ePD: L SFS and IPL, bilat. MFG, LPC
sPD VH < HC: L SFS, bilat. MFG, LPC, IPL, PCC
sPD NVH < HC: R LPC, bilat. IPL, PCC
15 sPD NVH 68 (11) 12.0 (4.5) 7 24.7 (1.8) 3.0 (0.6) 7
15 ePD NVH 66 (9) 3.3 (1.8) 26.2 (1.8) 2.1 (0.4)
15 MSA 67 (5) 3.9 (1.8) 25.2 (1.7) 3.2 (0.8)
15 HC 69 (6) - 28.7 (0.7) -
Gama et al. (2014) [35] 11 PD VH 70.6 (9.1) 2 7.4 (6.1) 2 Based on definition of VH 19.3 (3.7) 9 From stage I to stage IV ROI VBM
ROIs (SVC): temporal and frontal regions; group comparisons
Grey matter volume
p < 0.05 corrected
VH < HC: L opercula and SFG
NVH < HC: L SFG
28 PD NVH 65.7 (7.8) 6.5 (5.0) 25.6 (4.3)
10 HC 68.1 (7.0) - 25.6 (4.3)
Goldman et al. (2014) [27] 25 PD VH 74.8 (6.0) 2 13.1 (4.6) 2 MDS-UPDRS 23.9 (5.4) 2 3 (2-5) 2,10 Whole brain VBM
Covariate: TIV; group comparison; association between regions where VH < NVH and VH sev.
Grey matter volume
p < 0.01 uncorrected
VH < NVH: bilat. occipital, occipito-temporal, and parietal regions
Correlation with VH sev.: parietal, occipital, and occipito-temporal regions
25 PD NVH 75.4 (6.1) 10.8 (4.4) 25.1 (4.4) 3 (2-5) 10
Ibarretxe-Bilbao et al. (2010) [34] 12 PD VH 73.3 (5.9) 2 12.1 (5.7) 2 Structured interview; NPI 26.9 (1.9) 4,9,11 3.1 (1.1) 9 Whole brain VBM
Covariate: MMSE; comparison between baseline and follow-up in each group; correlations between atrophy progression and cognitive decline in PD VH
Grey matter loss form baseline to follow-up
p < 0.05 corrected
VH: bilat. parietal cortex, insula, STG, ITG, SFG, IFG, thalamus and limbic areas, L dorsal PCC
NVH: R frontal areas and cerebellum
Correlations with grey matter loss in PD VH: learning with L hippocampus, delayed recall with L prefrontal cortex, semantic fluency with L thalamus, language comprehension with L amygdala
14 PD VH 71.1 (5.7) 11.9 (4.3) 29.3 (1.6) 2.3 (0.5)
12 HC 70.7 (7.2) - 29.5 (2.6) -
Ibarretxe-Bilbao et al. (2008) [32] 16 PD VH 73.5 (5.1) 2 12.9 (5.9) 2 Structured interview 26.0 (2.1) 4,9 3.2 (1.1) ROI VBM
ROI: hippocampus; group comparison; correlation analysis with cognitive measures
Grey matter density
p < 0.05 corrected
VH vs. NVH and NVH vs. HC: NS
VH < HC: bilat. anterior hippocampus
Correlation with grey matter loss in anterior hippocampus bilaterally: learning scores in patients with PD VH, but not PD NVH and PDD
19 PD NVH 72.5 (5.8) 10.9 (4.2) 28.2 (1.7) 2.5 (0.7)
9 PDD 69.8 (9.5) 13.1 (5.4) 15.7 (5.4) 3.8 (1.0) 12
56 HC 73 (6.7) - 28.7 (3.1) -
Iizuka and Kameyama (2016) [18] 24 DLB 73 (68, 79) 13 2.8 (1.8, 3.2) 13 NPI 23 (20.5, 24) 13 NA ROI MRI
ROI: medial temporal lobe, correlation analysis
PET 8
Negative correlation with NPIhall in DLB: MTL atrophy
24 AD 74 (69, 81) 13 2.3 (1.6, 2.6) 13 23 (21, 24.5) 13
Janzen et al. (2012) [28] 13 PD VH 66.0 (6.9) 2 11.5 (5.2) SCOPA-PC 28.0 (1.7) 2.5 (0.3) 16 ROI VBM
ROI: thalamus and pedunculopontine nucleus; covariates: age, TIV; group comparisons
Whole brain VBM
Post-hoc analysis; group comparisons
Grey matter volume
ROI VBM
p < 0.05 corrected
PD VH < PD NVH: bilat. PPN
PD/PDD VH < PD NVH: bilat. PPN and thalamus
Whole brain VBM
p < 0.001 uncorrected
PD/PDD VH < PD NVH: PPN and thalamus
DLB/PDD VH < PD VH: R MFC
13 PDD VH 67.7 (7.1) 10.9 (5.5) 21.2 (2.7) 12,14 3.5 (1.0) 12,14
16 PD NVH 64.3 (8.0) 3.1 (3.6) 28.9 (1.6) 15 2.1 (0.5)
11 DLB 62.6 (6.5) 4.6 (4.5) 24.5 (1.4) NA
Kantarci et al. (2010) [46] 30 DLB 71 (55, 85) 10 NA VH definition; 64% of DLB 27 (14, 34) 10,17 NA DTI ROI
ROI: cortical GM regions and white matter tracts; group comparisons
Mean diffusivity
VH > NVH: ILF
30 AD 74 (48, 89) 10 24 (5, 33) 10,17
60 HC 73 (54, 86) 10 36 (28, 38) 10,17
Kantarci et al. (2012) [19] 21 DLB 73 (60, 87) 10 NA Freq. of VH: 4 point scale90% of DLB 22 (6, 29) 10 NA ROI MRI
Association between freq. of VH and hippocampal volumes in DLB
PET 8
Hippocampal volume
Association with VH freq.: NS
21 AD 77 (58, 92) 10 21 (6, 28) 10
42 HC 74 (59, 87) 10 29 (27, 30) 10
Lee et al. (2016) [20] 10 PD VH 69.2 (5.2) 2 7.2 (3.7) 2 Semi-structured interview 27.7 (1.6) 2 2.2 (0.5) 2 DTI ROI
ROI: optic nerve, optic radiation bilaterally; group comparisons
ROI MRI
ROIs: optic chiasm area; LGN volume; V1 volume; each volume divided by TIV; group comparison
White matter integrity
p < 0.016 corrected
VH < HC: FA: L optic nerve FA
NVH < HC: MD: bilat. optic nerve
VH > NVH and HC: MD: L optic radiation
VH > NVH: axial diffusivity: R optic nerve
VH > HC: RD: L optic radiation
Grey matter volume
VH < NVH: volume: L LGN
VH < HC: volume: bilat. LGN
14 PD NVH 66.1 (6.1) 7.3 (3.7) 28.4 (1.4) 2.1 (0.5)
15 HC 68.5 (6.6) - NA -
Lee et al. (2017) [21] 10 PD VH 69.4 (5.3) 2 7.2 (3.7) 2 Based on consensus criteria during clinical follow-up 27.6 (1.8) 2.2 (0.3) 12,14,16 Whole brain VBM
Covariates: age, gender, TIV; group comparisons;
TBSS DTI
Group comparisons; covariates: age, gender
Grey matter volume
p < 0.001 uncorrected
PD VH < PD NVH: R IPL, and SG
White matter
p < 0.05 corrected
PD VH vs. PD NVH: FA: NS
PD VH < HC: FA: fronto-temporo-parietal and brainstem regions bilaterally
PD NVH < HC: FA: fronto-temporal-parietal areas, midbrain and pons bilaterally
PD VH > HC: MD: L temporo-parietal, and lateral geniculate areas
21 PD NVH 66.2 (6.8) 7.0 (4.2) 28.2 (1.4) 1.8 (0.5)
17 PDD VH 71.1 (5.0) 6.2 (3.0) 20.4 (3.7) 12,14 2.8 (0.8)
30 HC 68.6 (6.0) - NA -
Meppelink et al. (2011) [24] 11 PD VH NA 2 8.0 (4.7) NPI NA 2 NA Whole brain VBM
Group comparisons; covariates: total grey matter
ROI MRI
ROI: L FG
Grey matter volume
Whole brain VBM
p < 0.05 cluster-level corrected
VH vs. NVH: NS
VH < HC: L temporal areas, parietal, occipital, frontal regions bilaterally
NVH < HC: L occipital, temporal regions, frontal and parietal regions bilaterally
ROI: FG: NS
13 PD NVH NA 7.9 (2.4) NA
14 HC NA - NA
Pagonabarraga et al. (2014) [29] 17 PD mVH 64.1 (9) 2 9.8 (7) 2 MDS-UPDRS 87.2 (13) 2, 18 1.9 (0.3) 2 Whole brain VBM
Covariates: age, gender, global grey matter volume; group comparisons; cluster threshold of 207 voxels determined through 1000 Monte Carlo simulations
Grey matter volume
p < 0.001 uncorrected
mVH < NVH: R vermis, and precuneus
mVH > NVH: cerebellum, L IFC
29 PD NVH 66.3 (8) 7.3 (4) 90.3 (13) 1.9 (0.4)
16 HC 66.8 (8) - 91.6 (11) -
Pereira et al. (2013) [42] 6 PD VH 73.7 (5.4) 2 12.9 (5.7) 2 NPI 26.1 (2) 4,9 3.1 (1) 2 ROI MRI
ROI: hippocampal subfields; correlations with cognitive measures
Grey matter volume
VH vs. NVH: NS
VH and NVH < HC: CA2-3, CA4-DG
VH < HC: subiculum, whole hippocampus
6 PD NVH 73.8 (6.8) 12.8 (6.3) 27.9 (1.4) 2.9 (0.9)
6 HC 73.6 (6.7) - 27.9 (2.1) -
Ramirez-Ruiz et al. (2007) [30] 18 PD VH PD matched with HC 12.6 (5.6) 2 NPI and structured questionnaire 27.0 (2.1) 4,9 3.2 (1.0) 9 Whole brain VBM
Covariates: TIV, MMSE, Hamilton, and H&Y scores; group comparison
Grey matter volume
p < 0.05 cluster-level corrected
VH < NVH: L LG and bilat. SPL
20 PD NVH 10.6 (4.3) 29.1 (1.4) 2.5 (0.7)
21 HC - 29.4 (2.3) -
Sanchez-Castaneda et al. (2010) [33] 6 DLB VH 70.17 (12.4) 2 32.8 (17.7) 19 NPI and Burnes Questionnaire 17.5 (5) 2 2.6 (0.5) 2 ROI VBM
ROI: frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal areas; covariates: TIV, disease duration, duration of dementia; group comparison; correlation analysis
Grey matter volume
p < 0.05 corrected
DLB VH < DLB NVH: R IFG
PDD VH < PDD NVH: L OFC
Correlations with VH sev.
p < 0.05 corrected
DLB: R IFG (r = 0.89), L precuneus (r = 0.95)
PDD: NS
6 DLB NVH 70.6 (7.1) 30 (11.8) 19 21.2 (8.1) 3 (0.7)
8 PDD VH 75.3 (4.9) 40.5 (16.8) 19, 20 21.5 (3.5) 2.8 (0.6)
7 PDD NVH 70.6 (7.1) 66 (24.8) 19 23.5 (4) 2.6 (1)
Shin et al. (2012) [25] 46 PD VH 71.3 (5.9) 2 3.3 (3.0) 2 NPI 25.2 (3.0) 2 NA Whole brain VBM
Group comparison; covariates: age, sex, PD duration, intracerebral volume, MMSE score
ROI MRI
Manually delineation of the ROI; group comparisons
Grey matter volume
VBM
VH < NVH
p < 0.001 uncorrected
R IFC, L temporal, and thalamic areas
VH < HC
p < 0.05 corrected
Parahippocampal area, insular cortex
ROI
VH < NVH: SI volume
Correlations with SI volume: verbal memory immediate, and delayed recall, semantic fluency, go/no-go tests
64 PD NVH 70.7 (5.7) 2.8 (3.0) 25.7 (2.9)
Watanabe et al. (2013) [31] 13 PD VH 66.6 (5.5) 2 10.0 (5.2) 2 UPDRS I 27.9 (1.9) 2 2.9 (0.6) 2 Whole brain VBM
Covariates: TIV, age, sex; group comparison
Grey matter volume
VH < NVH
p < 0.005 uncorrected
Bilat. PFC, PFC, L ventral cingulate cortex, primary visual cortex, PCC, occipito-temporal regions, R parietal, temporal, occipital regions
13 PD NVH 63.6 (10.7) 10.0 (4.0) 29.0 (1.5) 2.4 (0.8)
22 HC 63.4 (6.1) - 29.8 (0.4) -
Yao et al. (2016) [22] 12 PD VH 70 (64, 72.75) 2, 13 9.1 (3.5) 2 PPRS 28.5 (24, 29.75) 2,13 3.1 (0.7) 2 ROI MRI
Volume, and shape of the hippocampus; covariates: age, MMSE, intracranial volume; group comparison
ROI DTI
MD of the hippocampus; voxel-based MD of the hippocampus; covariates: age, MMSE; group comparison
Resting-state fMRI 8
Hippocampal volume and shape: NS
VH > NVH and HC: MD: R hippocampus; voxel-based MD (p < 0.05 corrected): R posterior hippocampal regions
15 PD NVH 66 (62, 72) 2 7.1 (5.1) 29 (28, 30) 13 2.9 (0.7)
14 HC 63 (62, 68.75) 2 - 29 (28, 29.25) 13 -
Yao et al. (2014) [17] 12 PD VH 67.6 (7.4) 2 10.0 (3.5) 2 PPRS 27.6 (2.4) 2 3.2 (0.7) 2 Cortical thickness
Covariates: age, MMSE score and levodopa-equivalent dosage; group comparison
Resting-state fMRI 8
Cortical thickness
p < 0.05 cluster-level corrected
No differences between groups
12 PD NVH 63.4 (7.4) 8.4 (5.1) 28.5 (1.7) 2.8 (0.9)
14 HC 64.1 (4.0) - 29.1 (0.7) -

1 Mean (SD); 2 no significant differences between groups; 3 no significant differences with AD; 4 VH ≠ HC; 5 no differences between DLB and AD; 6 no differences between sPD VH and sPD NVH; 7 sPD VH and NVH ≠ ePD; 8 functional neuroimaging is reported in Table A2; 9 VH ≠ NVH; 10 median (range); 11 MMSE: VH 6.5 point decline after 2 years follow-up (higher percentage of loss compared to NVH); 12 PDD ≠ PD NVH; 13 median (interquartile range); 14 PDD ≠ PD VH; 15 PD NVH ≠ DLB; 16 PD VH ≠ PD NVH; 17 Short test of Mental Status; 18 Parkinson’s disease-Cognitive Rating Scale; 19 months; 20 PDD VH ≠ DLB VH, DLB NVH, PDD VH. AD: Alzheimer’s disease; bilat.: bilateral; CAF: Clinician Assessment of Fluctuations; DLB: dementia with Lewy bodies; ed.: education; ePD: early PD; FA: fractional anisotropy ; FAB: Frontal Assessment Battery; FG: fusiform gyrus; freq.: frequency; H&Y: Hoehn and Yahr stage; HC: healthy controls; IFC: inferior frontal cortex; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; IPL: inferior parietal lobule; ITG: inferior temporal gyrus; LG: lingual gyrus; LGN: lateral geniculate nucleus; LPC: lateral parietal cortex; MD: mean diffusivity; MDS: Movement Disorders Society; MF: middle frontal gyrus; MFC: middle frontal cortex; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MSA: multiple system atrophy; NA: not available; NPI: Neuropsychiatric Inventory; NPIhall: NPI hallucination score; NS: not significant; NVH: no VH; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; PD: Parkinson’s disease; PDD: Parkinson’s disease dementia; PFC: prefrontal cortex; PPN: pedunculopontine nucleus; PPRS: Parkinson psychosis rating scale; pro-AD: prodromal AD; pro-DLB: prodromal DLB; project.: projecting; RD: radial diffusivity; ROI: region of interest; SCOPA-PC: Scales for Outcome in Parkinson’s disease Psychiatric Complications; sev.:severity; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; SFS: superior frontal sulcus; SG: supramarginal gyrus; SI: Substantia innominate; sPD: severe PD; SPG: superior parietal gyrus; SPL: superior parietal lobe; STG: superior temporal gyrus; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; VBM: voxel-based morphometry; VH: visual hallucinations.