Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 May 18;106(Pt A):147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.035

Table 2.

Correlations between carbonyl and free radical deliveries across different brands of cigarettes.

Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Propionaldehyde Crotonaldehyde Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) Total Carbonyls Ventilation
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde 0.009 (0.64)
Propionaldehyde 0.001 (0.87) 0.953 (< 0.001)
Crotonaldehyde (−) 0.005 (0.72) 0.395 (0.003) 0.356 (0.008)
MEK 0.000 (0.97) 0.909 (< 0.001) 0.895 (< 0.001) 0.510 (< 0.001)
Free Radicals (Gas Phase) (−) 0.107 (0.09) 0.416 (0.002) 0.418 (0.002) 0.209 (0.01) 0.327 (0.002) 0.370 (0.006) (−) 0.336 (0.001)
Free Radicals (Particulate Phase) 0.012 (0.50) 0.311 (0.002) 0.236 (0.009) 0.054 (0.23) 0.172 (0.03) 0.268 (0.005) (−) 0.313 (0.002)
TPM 0.0003 (0.93) 0.440 (< 0.001) 0.421 (0.002) 0.225 (0.01) 0.401 (0.003) 0.435 (< 0.001) (−) 0.564 (< 0.001)
Ventilation 0.009 (0.63) (−) 0.589 (< 0.001) (−) 0.589 (< 0.001) (−) 0.411 (0.002) (−) 0.526 (< 0.001) (−) 0.600 (< 0.001)
a

Values are r2 with negative sign added to indicate a negative correlation and corresponding p-values in parentheses.