Table 4.
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |
Born 1856, unknown birth month | ± | ± | ||
Born Sep–Dec 1855 | 1.146 | 0.82, 1.61 | 1.138 | 0.81, 1.6 |
Born Jan–Mar 1856 | 0.782 | 0.51, 1.19 | 0.78 | 0.51, 1.19 |
Born Apr–Jun 1856 | 1.352 | 0.86, 2.14 | 1.347 | 0.85, 2.13 |
Born Jul–Sep 1856 | 0.823 | 0.51, 1.33 | 0.822 | 0.51, 1.33 |
Born Oct–Dec 1856 | 0.844 | 0.55, 1.3 | 0.838 | 0.54, 1.29 |
Born 1857–1861 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Born 1862–1866 | 0.932*** | 0.89, 0.97 | 0.934*** | 0.89, 0.98 |
Born 1867–1871 | 0.911*** | 0.87, 0.95 | 0.914*** | 0.88, 0.95 |
Mother died when child was age 10 and under | 1.021 | 0.95, 1.1 | ||
Father died when child was age 10 and under | 1.079** | 1, 1.16 | ||
Missing information on child’s age at either parent’s death | 1.008 | 0.95, 1.07 | ||
Nam-Powers Score (Source: Spouse or Ego Death Certificate, Unit = 10) | 0.973 | 0.96, 0.99 | ||
Nam-Powers Score missing (= 1) | 1.031 | 0.98, 1.08 | ||
Spouse is a farmer (= 1) | 0.996 | 0.94, 1.05 | ||
First-born child (= 1) | 1.072** | 1.03, 1.12 | ||
No LDS church participation (ref) | 1.00 | |||
Inactive LDS church participation | 0.965 | 0.91, 1.02 | ||
Active LDS Church participation | 0.935** | 0.89, 0.98 | ||
Married before age 50 (= 1) | 0.982 | 0.9, 1.08 | ||
1–6 children (ref) | 1.00 | |||
7 or more children | 1.028 | 0.99, 1.07 | ||
Nulliparous | 1.017 | 0.97, 1.07 | ||
Non-proportional effects (interaction with time) | ||||
Born Sep–Dec 1855 | 0.995 | 0.98, 1.01 | 0.996 | 0.98, 1.01 |
Born Jan–Mar 1856 | 1.005 | 0.99, 1.02 | 1.005 | 0.99, 1.02 |
Born Apr–Jun 1856 | 0.985* | 0.97, 1.00 | 0.985* | 0.97, 1.00 |
Born Jul–Sep 1856 | 1.007 | 0.99, 1.03 | 1.008 | 0.99, 1.03 |
Born Oct–Dec 1856 | 1.007 | 0.99, 1.02 | 1.007 | 0.99, 1.02 |
n | 14,567 | 14,567 | ||
Likelihood ratio χ2 (df) | 31.99 (13) | 78.83 (25) | ||
AIC | 251,191.4 | 251,168.6 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; LDS, Latter-Day Saint; AIC, Akaike information criterion.
Significant differences for this group exist; however, the sample size is small (n = 4) and the estimates are not reliable.
Exponentiated coefficients; 95% CIs in second column.
P < 0.1,
P < 0.05,
P < 0.001.