Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 23;81(3):539–547. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.012

Table 3.

Performance of ESS for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps based on size

Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Specificity, % (95% CI) Accuracy, % (95% CI) NPV, % (95% CI) HCR % (95% CI)
All Polyps (N = 218) High-Confidence Decisions 91.5 (83.2–96.5) 92.2 (85.6–96.4) 91.9 (87.1–95.3) 93.8 (87.7–97.5) 90.4 (85.7–93.9)
All Decisions 89.4 (80.8–95.0) 86.5 (79.5–91.8) 87.6 (82.5–91.7) 92.7 (86.7–96.2)
Polyps < 1 cm (n = 179) High-Confidence Decisions 87.0 (73.7–95.1) 92.1 (85.5–96.3) 90.6 (85.0–94.7) 94.6 (88.6–98.0) 89.3 (83.9–93.5)
All Decisions 83.3 (69.8–92.5) 86.3 (79.2–91.6) 85.5 (79.4–90.3) 93.4 (87.4–97.1)
Polyps ≤ 5 mm (n = 157) High-Confidence Decisions 86.8 (71.9–95.6) 91.3 (84.1–95.9) 90.1 (83.9–94.7) 95.0 (89.5–98.5) 89.8 (84.0–94.1)
All Decisions 82.5 (67.2–92.7) 86.3 (78.7–92.0) 85.3 (78.8–90.5) 93.5 (87.1–97.4)
Rectosigmoid Polyps ≤ 5 mm (n = 85) High-Confidence Decisions 88.9 (51.8–99.7) 91.2 (81.8–96.7) 90.9 (82.2–96.3) 98.4 (91.5–99.9) 90.6 (82.3–95.8)
All Decisions 80.0 (44.4–97.5) 86.7 (76.8–93.4) 85.9 (76.6–92.5) 97.0 (86.9–99.6)