Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec 17;10(1):49–58. doi: 10.1177/1556264614563249

Table 1.

Demographic Information on Study Adolescent Cohort.

n (%)
Study site
 NIH 147 (83.1)
 Seattle Children’s 30 (16.9)
Gender
 Male 86 (48.6)
 Female 91 (51.4)
Age M (SD) 15.1 (1.4)
Ethnicitya
 Hispanic/Latino 22 (12.4)
Raceb
 White/Caucasian 123 (69.5)
 Black/African American 26 (14.7)
 Native American 6 (3.4)
 Asian 8 (4.5)
 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2 (1.1)
 Other 20 (11.3)
 Don’t know or did not answer 8 (4.5)
Illness status
 Healthy 35 (19.8)
 Minor condition 9 (5.1)
 Significant, well-controlled 80 (45.2)
 Significant, not-well-controlled 31 (17.5)
 Significant, life-threatening 22 (12.4)
Study typec
 Healthy controld 39 (22.0)
 Psychological condition 14 (7.9)
 Medical condition 124 (70.0)
Functionalitye
 Able to do all/most activities 87 (49.2)
 Able to do few/no activities 51 (28.8)
 Don’t know or did not answer 39 (22.0)
Previous research participation
 None 98 (55.4)
 1–2 studies 51 (28.8)
 3–6 studies 17 (9.6)
 >6 studies 9 (5.1)

Note. NIH = National Institutes of Health.

a

Self-defined.

b

Self-defined, participants could choose more than one race.

c

From protocol data.

d

Four adolescents had an illness, but were categorized as “healthy controls” because the research in which they were participating was not related to their illness.

e

Based on the parent’s response.