. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 28.

Published in final edited form as: Am Educ Res J. 2016 Oct 23;53(6):1732–1758. doi: 10.3102/0002831216674804

Table 3.

Descriptive Data for Demographic Comparisons: Gender

Male (n = 59)

Female (n = 176)

Trans/G-Queer (n = 26)

η_{p}^{2}

Tukey Post Hoc Comparisons

Engagement

2.79 (1.03)

2.74 (0.95)

3.29 (0.90)

3.79^*

.03

T/G > F

M. duration

1.19 (1.06)

1.64 (1.23)

2.00 (1.24)

5.03^**

.04

M < T/G, F

LGB friends

3.27 (1.67)

3.42 (1.59)

3.62 (1.65)

0.43

—

Trans friends

0.80 (1.14)

0.68 (0.93)

1.77 (1.73)

11.52^***

.08

T/G > M, F

Sup/soc received

4.59 (0.47)

4.41 (0.74)

4.56 (0.58)

1.86

—

Structure

3.16 (0.71)

3.03 (0.71)

3.02 (0.86)

0.74

—

Open climate

4.68 (0.65)

4.59 (0.71)

4.77 (0.34)

1.07

—

Note. Values represent the means and standard deviations (in parentheses) of scores for each demographic group. Engagement = level of youth engagement in the GSA; M. duration = membership duration in number of years; LGB friends = number of LGB friends; trans friends = number of transgender friends; sup/soc received = amount of support/socializing received from the GSA; structure = perceived level of structure within the GSA; open climate = perceived level of open climate within the GSA; trans/g-queer = trans/gender-queer youth. For Tukey post hoc comparisons, T/G = trans/gender-queer youth, M = cisgender male youth, and F = cisgender female youth. GSA = Gay-Straight Alliance.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.