Table 2. Simulation results of cluster model 1 (10% and 40% of the total cases in the true cluster).
Maximum reported cluster size | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | Default | |
Scenario A | |||||||||||||||||
200 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 40 | 109 | 729 | 5 | 36 | 24 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Sensitivity | - | 0.67 | - | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 0.96 |
PPV | - | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.38 | - | - | - | 0.97 |
800 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 134 | 109 | 189 | 3 | 492 | 55 | 18 | |
Sensitivity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
PPV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.96 |
Scenario B | |||||||||||||||||
200 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 26 | 120 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 31 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 12 | |
Sensitivity | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.72 |
PPV | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.56 |
800 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 41 | 85 | 442 | 191 | 231 | |
Sensitivity | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.33 | 0.33 | - | - | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 |
PPV | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.82 |
Scenario C | |||||||||||||||||
200 cases | 0 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 180 | 598 | 13 | 60 | 60 | 28 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
# of OMRCS | - | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.90 |
Sensitivity | - | 1.00 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.92 |
PPV | |||||||||||||||||
800 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 94 | 11 | 717 | 111 | 45 | |
Sensitivity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
PPV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.94 |
Scenario D | |||||||||||||||||
200 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 23 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 214 | 450 | 26 | 78 | 71 | 45 | 24 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
Sensitivity | - | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.99 | 0.67 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.81 |
PPV | - | 1.00 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.83 |
800 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 55 | 16 | 658 | 153 | 103 | |
Sensitivity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
PPV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.92 |
Scenario E | |||||||||||||||||
200 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 25 | 130 | 684 | 9 | 47 | 40 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | |
Sensitivity | - | 0.33 | - | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | 0.92 |
PPV | - | 1.00 | - | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.37 | .31 | 0.27 | - | 0.94 |
800 cases | |||||||||||||||||
# of OMRCS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 19 | 37 | 4 | 767 | 115 | 22 | |
Sensitivity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
PPV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.95 |
# of OMRCS, frequency chosen as the optimal maximum reported cluster size by the Gini coefficient among 1000 random data sets; PPV, positive predictive value.