Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181357

Table 10. Patterns of relative INSTI susceptibility for 1,536 viruses in HIVDB with 209 distinct INSTI-Resistance patterns*.

RAL EVG DTG % of Total Relative INSTI Susceptibility Profiles Example DRM Patterns§ DRM Pattern % with Profile DRM Pattern % of Total
Susc Susc Susc 34.9 E157Q 65.7 22.9
T97A 32.3 11.3
Q95K 2.1 0.7
High High Int 18.4 G140S,Q148H 66.7 12.3
G140S,Q148R 3.5 0.6
E138K,Q148R 3.2 0.6
High High Susc 17.1 N155H 55.5 9.5
N155H,G163R 12.5 2.1
N155H,E157Q 12.2 2.1
Low Low Susc 6.5 G163R 30 2.0
E138K 21 1.4
G163K 17 1.1
High High High 5.3 E138A,G140S,Q148H 23.2 1.2
E138K,G140S,Q148H 18.3 1.0
E138T,G140S,Q148H 6.1 0.3
High High Low 4.5 E92Q,N155H 23.2 1.0
Q148R 14.5 0.7
Y143C,N155H,S230R 7.2 0.3
High Int Susc 3.4 L74M,T97A,Y143R 15.4 0.5
T97A,Y143C,S230R 11.5 0.4
T97A,Y143R,G163R 11.5 0.4
High Low Susc 2.2 T97A,Y143R 58.8 1.3
L74M,Y143R 20.6 0.5
T97A,Y143C 8.8 0.2
Int High Susc 1.8 E92Q 55.6 1.0
E92Q,T97A 14.8 0.3
T66A,G163R 7.4 0.1
High Susc Susc 1.4 Y143R 71.4 1.0
Y143C 9.5 0.1
Y143S 9.5 0.1
Low Int Low 1.2 R263K 94.4 1.1
E157Q,R263K 5.6 0.1
High Int Low 1 L74M,T97A,Y143C,S230R 25 0.3
L74I,T97A,Y143C,S230R 12.5 0.1
Y143C,G163R,S230R 12.5 0.1

*Obtained from HIVDB (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/dr-summary/pattern-scores/INSTI/) January 2017. For the purposes of this analysis, the HIVDB interpretations of “Susc” and “Potential Low resistance” were grouped together as “Susc”.

Relative susceptibility patterns accounting for ≥1% of all such patterns are shown. These patterns account for the HIVDB interpretations of 97.7% of sequences containing ≥1 INSTI DRM.

§For each relative INSTI susceptibility pattern, the three most common INSTI DRM patterns responsible for the relative susceptibility pattern are shown as examples.