Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016 Jul 22;9(4):279–290. doi: 10.1007/s12265-016-9706-0

Table 2.

Summary of tuned targets

Patient ID BP-clinic (mmHg) BP-sim (mmHg) SV-clinic (ml/cycle) SV-sim (ml/cycle) %CO to Cor-lit %CO to Cor-sim L-R flow-sim in %
Patient 1 124/73 118/74.5 60.9 63.5 4.0 4.0 65.7–34.3
Patient 2 133/85 133/85.5 80.4 84.7 4.0 3.9 82.0–18.0
Patient 3 135/78 133/78 78.1a 75.8 4.0 4.0 52.5–47.5
Patient 4 115/74 117/74 115.1 114.8 4.0 4.1 56.4–43.6
Patient 5 113/69 115/68 70.5 70.6 4.0 4.1 74.0–26.0

Summary of non-invasive clinical measurements, population averaged targets from literature and respective quantities from simulations. The LPN was tuned to match, within 10 % error, a combination of non-invasive clinical measurements for the patient and population averaged values from literature

BP blood pressure (mmHg), SV stroke volume (ml/cardiac cycle), % CO to Cor percentage of cardiac output perfusing the coronaries, L-R left-right coronary flow expressed in percentage, -clinic value from clinic, -sim value from simulation, -lit value from literature

a

No echocardiogram data for patient, body mass index-based population average was used