Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemics. 2017 Feb 21;19:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.02.008

Table 4.

Comparative epidemiologic outcomes with the monovalent vaccine at higher or lower coverage levels compared to the baseline coverage level (Table 1).

Cross immunity 90% Cross immunity 70% Cross immunity 50%
Vaccine coverage relative to baseline % epidemics with lower cumulative incidence than baseline Average epidemic size compared to baseline (95% CI) % epidemics with lower cumulative incidence than baseline average epidemic size compared to baseline (95% CI) % epidemics with lower cumulative incidence than baseline average epidemic size compared to baseline (95% CI)
Uniform coverage 100% −37.2% (−99.8%, −0.8%) 100% −38.4% (−99.8%, −9.1%) 100% −40.3% (−99.8%, −9.5%)
50% increase 100% −8.9% (−47.1%, −1.7%) 100% −10.3% (−47.7%, 2.5%) 100% −11.8% (−49.4%, −2.8%)
25% increase 99.9% −4.4% (−27.1%, −0.8%) 100% −5.4% (−26.3%, −1.3%) 100% −6.4% (−27.8%, −1.4%)
10% increase 99.1% −1.8% (−11.9%, −0.3%) 100% −2.2% (−11.4%, −0.5%) 100% −2.8% (−11.4%, −0.6%)
10% reduction 1.3% +1.8% (0.3%, 12.2%) 0.1% +2.4% (0.5%, 11.6%) 0% +3.4% (0.6%, 11.6%)
25% reduction 1.0% +4.6% (0.7%, 31.9%) 0% +6.6% (1.4%, 29.9%) 0% +9.7% (1.7%, 30%)
40% reduction 0.9% +7.7% (1.2%, 52.3%) 0% +11.5% (2.3%, 49.1%) 0% +17.7% (2.9%, 49.5%)