Table 2.
Study | n | % Detect | Mean | Median | Min-max | NOAEL | LOAEL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemical analyses | |||||||
Mouse bones | |||||||
Pooled femurs and tibias, controls15 | 2a | 100 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64–0.73 | — | — |
Pooled femurs and tibias, exposed15 | 2a | 100 | 3.35 | 3.35 | 3.0–3.7 | — | 3.0b |
Human bone bank (current study) | |||||||
Trabecular bone | 19 | 63 | 0.15 | 0.18 | <LOQ-0.38 | — | — |
Bone marrow | 19 | 100 | 0.44 | 0.34 | <LOQ-1.5 | — | — |
Other studies | |||||||
Spanish population, rib bone12 | 20 | 55 | 60.2 | 20.9 | <LOQ-234 | — | — |
Swedish women, nursing, serum41 | 413 | — | 1.71 | — | — | — | — |
US Firefighters, serum42 | 12 | 100 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 2–12 | — | — |
US Population, serum43 | 2094 | 99.7 | 3.9 | 4.0 | <LOQ-4.3 | — | — |
Finnish Firefighters, serum44 | 8 | 100 | 3.2 | 2.94 | 1.61–4.85 | — | — |
Swedish population, serum45 | 579 | 100 | 2.8 | — | 0.33–15 | — | — |
In vitro –studies | |||||||
Cells, mouse15 | |||||||
Osteoblasts | — | — | — | — | — | 41.4 | 414.1c |
Osteoclasts | — | — | — | — | — | 41.4 | 414.1d |
Cells, human (present study) | |||||||
Osteoblasts | — | — | — | — | — | 82 814e | — |
Osteoclasts, PB | — | — | — | — | — | — | 41.4f |
Osteoclasts, MSCs | — | — | — | — | — | 41.4 | 414.1g |
Data from the present study and the indicated references. NOAEL = no-observed adverse effect level, LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level.
aPooled samples from 20 animals, n = 5 in each group.
bIncreased femoral periosteal and medullary area, decreased cortical mineral density of tibias.
cIncreased osteocalcin expression.
dIncreased resorption area.
eNo significant effects.
fIncreased number of osteoclasts.
gIncreased resorption area.