Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 16;2017:5460429. doi: 10.1155/2017/5460429

Table 2.

Quality assessment.

PAPER Christie et al., 2010 Zeng and Gao 2013 El and Palomo, 2014 Zhao et al., 2010 Iwasaki et al., 2013 Chang et al., 2013 Ribeiro et al., 2012 Pangrazio-Kulbersh et al., 2012 da Baratieri et al., 2014
Study design
Time 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Randomized sample 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Control group 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1
Sample size 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sample gender 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Objective 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Selection criteria 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Baseline characteristics 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
Study measurements
Segmentation method 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Type of airway measurements 1 2 3 4 2 3 3 1 2
Blinding measurements method 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Data analysis
Statistical analysis 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Validation of measurements
(error of the method)
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Data presentation 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Total points 8 10 14 15 10 12 8 9 15
% score 36 45 63 68 45 54 36 40 68