Abstract
Over the past decade, human microbiome research has energized the study of human evolution through a complete shift in our understanding of what it means to be human. The microbiome plays a pivotal role in human biology, performing key functions in digestion, mood and behavior, development and immunity, and a range of acute and chronic diseases. It is therefore critical to understand its evolution and changing ecology through time. Here we review recent findings on the microbiota of diverse human populations, non-human primates, and past human populations and discuss the implications of this research in formulating a deeper evolutionary understanding of the human holobiont.
Introduction
Over the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that the study of human evolution is not complete without consideration of the human microbiome [1–3]. In addition to our own somatic cells, our bodies are a patchwork landscape that is home to thousands of different microbial species that number in the tens of trillions of cells [4•]. Rather than mere transient germs, these co-resident microbes contain an immense diversity of genes that interact directly with our physiology to carry out vital functions [5, 6]. A growing awareness of these roles has resulted in a radical shift from thinking of human-associated microbes solely in terms of pathogenicity to considering them essential members of human biology [7, 8] and a key component of the human holobiont [9].
Until very recently, human evolutionary genetics focused almost exclusively on patterns of variation found within our mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Yet, the microbiome plays important roles in multiple core aspects of human biology, including digestion and energy metabolism, immune development, neurological function, and infectious disease susceptibility. As such, human-associated microbial communities (microbiota) and their microbial ecosystems (microbiomes) [10•] serve as accessory genetic reservoirs that are highly responsive to changes in human environments and lifestyles (Figure 1) and function as a shared target for natural selection. The growing body of knowledge on the relationship between the host genome, the microbiome, and the environment thus helps to answer fundamental questions about the role of microbial evolution and ecology in broader patterns of human evolution.
Figure 1.
Overview of major functions of the human microbiome with evolutionary significance. (a) The oral microbiome a reservoir for numerous pathobionts and opportunistic pathogens [104, 105, 154]. (b) Skin microbiota influence mosquito attraction and may impact transmission of insect-borne diseases, such as malaria [138, 139]. (c) Bacterial inoculation of the breast assists infants with milk digestion [31]; breastmilk contains human-specific oligosaccharides that promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria [45–47, 48••, 49]. (d) The placenta harbors an oral-like microbiome [32]; oral and vaginal dysbioses increase risk for preterm labor and stillbirth [33, 34]. (e) Human microbiota are hotspots for horizontal gene transfer [128•, 129–131]; antibiotic resistance genes in oral and gut microbiota predate the use of therapeutic antibiotics [56•, 104, 127]. (f) Ecological structure of the vaginal microbiome influences risk for contracting sexually transmitted infections [137••]. (g) External microbial fermentation expands the food resources available to humans [94, 99, 100]; gut microbes play key roles in milk lactose [89] and wheat gluten [87, 88, 92] digestion and intolerance. (h) Gut microbes produce neurotransmitters and influence stress, anxiety, and mood by communication with the brain via the vagus nerve [106–108, 115•]. (i) Oral biofilms exhibit extensive evidence for host-microbial and microbial-microbial coevolution in biofilm formation [166–169]. (j) Gut microbes are critical for the development of the immune system early in life [31, 51, 52, 117]. (k) Infants acquire their microbiota via both vertical and horizontal transmission and are subject to environmental influences [28•, 36••, 37, 44••]. (l) Traditional and industrialized societies have distinct gut microbiota [53, 54, 55•, 56•, 57]; industrialized microbiota are less diverse and lack specific taxa [55•]. (m) Gut microbes convert dietary fiber into short chain fatty acids such as butyrate [86•, 170], the primary nutrient for colonocytes [80, 81•]. (n) Gut microbes synthesize B and K vitamins [82, 83], catabolize xenobiotics, drugs, and toxins [65], and play key roles in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism [84]. (o) Some microbial strains exhibit patterns of genetic variation that mirror human migration histories [125, 155, 156].
In this review, we discuss how recent human microbiome research informs work in human evolutionary genetics and how our understanding of human origins stands to benefit from a unification of both fields.
We also highlight how paleogenomics, the study of ancient genomes, is advancing our knowledge of the ancestral human microbiome and propose critical next steps forward.
Human microbiome research in context
With the conclusion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 [11] and successive efforts in whole genome sequencing of modern humans [e.g. [12]], archaic humans (including Neanderthals, Denisovans and the recently discovered Sima de los Huesos hominins) [13, 14], and the great apes [15–18], comparative functional genomics has emerged as a leading research front poised to gain crucial insights into human-specific biology [19, 20]. Complementing this endeavor, the Human Microbiome Project, initiated in 2007, leveraged advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies to extend this research to the human microbiome [21].
Historically, the human microbiome has been generally overlooked in human genetics research, in large part due to the difficulty and complexity of characterizing microbial ecosystems using conventional molecular tools and culture-based techniques [22, 23]. The advent of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has made microbiome research feasible for the first time, allowing not only large-scale microbial surveys based on the amplification and massively parallel sequencing of taxonomically informative marker genes (metataxonomics), but also detailed community gene inventories (metagenomics) and functional analyses (metatranscriptomics) [10•]. In addition to these technological achievements, NGS has also enabled a rapid expansion of microbial reference genomes available for comparative analysis, and as of 2016 complete reference genomes were available for 1665 bacterial, 3 archaeal, 111 viral, and 1 eukaryotic human-associated taxa (http://hmpdacc.org/reference_genomes/reference_genomes.php). Increasingly, these reference genomes are not limited to cultured organisms alone, but can be reconstructed directly from metagenomic data [24•]. This approach has yielded some of the first genomic glimpses at ‘dark matter’ candidate phyla such as TM7 [25], a clade of epibiotic and parasitic bacteria that includes important members of the human oral microbiome [26], but which has proven largely un-cultivable to date. Collectively, these developments have allowed us to advance our understanding of the role of the microbiome in human biology and evolution.
Role of the microbiome in human biology and evolution
Microbiome establishment and dispersal
As with any complex biological system, the initial establishment of the microbiome in infants is controlled by a combination of environmental factors and host genetics. Specifically, mode of birth (vaginal delivery vs C-section) plays a significant role in seeding the infant microbiome, with transference of taxa to the infant from maternal vaginal and gut microbiomes in the case of vaginal birth, and skin and environmental microbes in the case of C-sections [27, 28•, 29, 30]. While this results in a significant difference in early microbiome structure, particularly with reduced species richness among C-section infants, the long-term implications are still unknown [31]. Microbial colonization of the placenta in utero may also play a role in microbial seeding [32], but the impact of prenatal microbial exposure is unclear and largely associated with adverse effects [33–35]. Once established, the infant microbiome undergoes a series of microbial succession events, coinciding with changes in diet, and begins to achieve an adult-like profile with the introduction of solid foods [36••, 37].
While environmental factors play a major role in the acquisition and structuring of the human microbiome, several studies have now also identified associations between specific microbial taxa and host genotypes, particularly in the human gut [38, 39•, 40–43]. One such association is between the expression levels of the maternal Fucosyltransferase-2 gene (FUT2) and the establishment of Bifidobacterium in the infant gut, with infants born to non-secretor mothers (FUT2−/−) having a delayed acquisition of this genus [44••]. Members of this genus are a major component of the gut microbiome in breast-fed infants, are uniquely adapted to metabolize human milk oligosaccharides [45–47, 48••], and are known to play a critical role in infant health by regulating gut permeability and reducing inflammation [49]. Understanding these differential patterns in the establishment and maturation of the microbiome [50], particularly in relation to the onset of metabolic and inflammatory disorders [51, 52], is a major emerging topic of interest in the study of early childhood development.
Diet is also a major driver of gut microbiome diversity in adulthood (Figure 2). Several microbial taxa show strong associations with dietary lifestyle, particularly across human populations (Figure 3). This is evident in a higher prevalence and abundance of genera such as Prevotella, Catenibacterium, Succinivibrio, and Treponema among both contemporary [53, 54, 55•, 56•, 57, 58] and ancient [59, 60] populations following a traditional subsistence lifestyle (i.e., hunting and gathering or subsistence agriculture), whose diets are often characterized by greater consumption of dietary fiber and other complex carbohydrates. The specific loss of these bacterial taxa during the transition from rural-traditional to urban-industrial life-styles governs the primary structure observed in global biogeographic analyses of the human gut microbiome [55•]. A similar pattern of generational microbial loss accompanying dietary change has recently been demonstrated in a mouse model [61••]. Importantly, unlike human genomic diversity, this loss of bacterial diversity is independent of physical distance from the birthplace of humanity, Africa.
Figure 2.
Comparison of hominid gut microbiota. (a) Map of human and non-human primate populations for which comparable 16S rRNA V4 datasets are available [55•, 57, 58, 171]. (b) Principle Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) representing genus-level community structure observed among hominid gut microbiota. Human gut microbiota are highly distinct from that of other hominids, and the gut microbiota of traditional human societies, including the Hadza of Tanzania, the Matses and Tunapuco of Peru, the Guahibo of Venezuela, and rural Malawians, exhibit the greatest microbial diversity. The proportion of variance explained by each principal coordinate axis is denoted in the corresponding axis label.
Figure 3.
Heatmap of genus-level taxa differentiating human, chimpanzee, bonobo, and gorilla gut microbiota. Analyses were performed on 16S rRNA V4 region data, rarefied to a depth of 10 000 reads per sample [55•, 57, 58, 171]. Each column represents an individual, and each row represents a bacterial genus. Taxa for which genus identification is currently unknown are denoted by asterisks. The heatmap is color-coded based on rowz-scores. Host population is indicated using the same color scheme as in Figure 2, and bacterial genera are color-coded by phylum. Heatmap shows 43 genera with significant differences in abundance between populations (Kruskal-Wallis, FDR-corrected p < 0.05). Data are organized by hierarchical clustering, and microbiota form distinct clades broadly corresponding to host taxonomy. Humans and non-human primates form two distinct clades, and within humans, gut microbiota form two subclades based on traditional (Tanzania, Malawi, Peru, Venezuela) vs. industrialized (USA and Italy) subsistence strategies. Among non-human primates, the gut microbiota of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) are broadly similar, while gorillas exhibit a high degree of substructure. Similar microbial patterns shared between some chimpanzees and gorillas have been attributed to sympatric microbial transmission [172].
Among primate species, humans have the largest biogeographic spread, occupying diverse niches ranging from tropical rainforests to polar deserts, with vastly different nutritional sources. When compared to other primates, humans show a greater similarity in gut microbiome composition to omnivorous New World monkeys than our nearest evolutionary neighbors, the great apes [62]. Comparisons of gut microbiome community structure among hominids (great apes and humans) show human populations forming a distinct cluster (Figure 2). Further, comparisons of relative abundance profiles of microbial genera reveal the presence of host specific microbial assemblages (Figure 3), though not all microbial taxa are reflective of host phylogeny. While these broad patterns of association between microbial taxa and host phylogeny and subsistence have been primarily inferred from metataxonomic data, the increasing availability of high throughput shotgun metagenomic datasets and analytical tools [24•, 63, 64] makes it feasible to expand these analyses to explore genome-wide strain level variation of specific microbial taxa. This is important as we seek to better understand the mechanisms underlying observed microbial-host associations.
Digestion and metabolism
The success of the genus Homo was aided by progressive advancements in tool and cooking technologies, which likely contributed to our relatively reduced and unspecialized digestive physiology [65, 66]. Yet through evolution, we have acquired an increase in energy throughput relative to other great apes [67], and simultaneously imposed stringent nutritional demands to support reproduction and brain function [68]. These evolutionary processes did not exclude the microbiome, as anatomical and physiological variations overwhelmingly define its taxonomic and gene composition [62, 69–71]. This is consistent with the view that, while guided in part by host genetic factors specific to diet sensing, metabolism, and immunity [40, 43, 72, 73] the gut microbiome is also strongly influenced by diet, gut morphology, and available energy substrates [31, 74, 75•, 76, 77]. Long-term residents of the gut microbiome must maintain some degree of genetic stability in order to effectively integrate with the host; however, factors that influence ecological structure, such as taxa proliferation and horizontal gene transfer, are highly dynamic over time. The result of these competing pressures is an ecological system that is highly responsive to short-term [75•, 78] and long-term [55•, 56•] dietary influences, but which is ultimately constrained by host anatomy and physiology [62, 79], resulting in microbiota that are distinctive for each host species (Figure 2).
Microbiota play an important role in nutritional buffering. Many recent studies lend evidence to oral and gut micro-biome function in human nutrition, including key roles in nutrient [80, 81•] and vitamin [82, 83] synthesis, xenobiotic and secondary bioactive compound metabolism [56•, 65, 84, 85], gluconeogenesis [86••], and digestion of refractory compounds such as polysaccharides, gluten, and lactose [87–93]. In addition, humans are able to take advantage of a wide range of microbially assisted and fermented foods [94], in part because of an enhanced capacity to digest ethanol in the hominid lineage [95]. As such, microbes can be viewed as important players in recent human events, such as the rise of grain-based agriculture and the spread of human genetic variants that facilitate lactose tolerance and dairying. Gluten-degrading microorganisms are found in the human oral and gut microbiomes [87, 88], but their role in digesting gluten-containing grains (e.g., wheat, barley and rye) is not well understood. Comparative studies of gluten-degrading microorganisms in diverse populations with and without Triticeae grain-based agriculture may yield valuable information about the role of gluten and gluten-digesting microbes in the human microbiome.
Milk consumption beyond infancy has clear nutritional advantages, as evidenced in part by the widespread and independent prehistoric origins of dairying on three continents [96–98]. However, adult milk consumption is hampered by the fact that humans, like all mammals, lose the ability to produce functional levels of lactase, the enzyme responsible for host milk lactose digestion, after infancy [96, 97]. Continued milk consumption in the absence of sufficient lactase production results in extensive microbial fermentation of lactose in the distal colon, the by-products of which produce the symptoms of lactose intolerance [89]. Different human populations have responded to the challenges of milk consumption in different ways, with some populations developing adaptive alleles that enable persistent host lactase expression, while others have come to rely almost exclusively on external microbial fermentation. External fermentation of milk lactose into lactic acid and carbon dioxide facilitates adult consumption of dairy products in the form of yogurts and cheeses [89, 98–100]. Because of colder climates, such external paths to fermentation are more challenging in northern latitudes, and the absence of efficient external methods of fermentation may have produced a strong selective environment for the rise of genetic lactase persistence in northern Europe [96].
In addition to microbiota enabling humans to expand their ecological niche, humans have likewise provided evolutionary opportunities for our resident microbes. Phylogenetic analysis of the dental caries-associated pathogen Streptococcus mutans indicates that it underwent a rapid population expansion within the last 10 000 years, strongly implicating the adoption and intensification of agriculture in this process [101]. Ancient genetic sequences from S. mutans isolated from the dental calculus (calcified dental plaque) of early Bronze Age individuals (ca. 2200-1000 BCE) [102] and subsequent populations [103, 104] may yield future insights into the dynamics of this process [105].
Brain growth, development, and behavior
The human brain is our defining species trait, and its developmental underpinnings are key foci of evolutionary genetics research. Recent research on brain development and social interaction in both humans and animal models has revealed that microbes exert a major impact on cognitive function and behavioral patterns [106]. For example, a growing consensus recognizes that cognitive and behavioral pathogenesis are often co-expressed with functional bowel disorders [107]. This hints at a shared communication or effector pathway between the brain and gut, termed the gutbrain-axis (GBA). The enteric environment is considered a third arm of the autonomic nervous system [108], and gut microbes produce more than 90% of the body’s serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT) [109]. Factors critical to learning and plasticity such as serotonin, γ-aminobutryic acid (GABA), short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which train amygdalin and hippocampal reactivity, can be mediated through gut-brain chemical signals that cross-activate bacterial and host receptors [86••, 106, 107]. Probiotic treatment is associated with positive neurological changes in the brain such as increased BDNF, altered expression of GABA receptors, increased circulating glutathione, and a reduction in inflammatory markers. This implicates the gut microbiome in early emotional training as well as in affecting long-term cognitive plasticity.
Critically, gut microbiota can modulate synthesis of metabolites affecting gene expression for myelin production in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), presumably influencing the oligodendrocyte transcriptome [110•, 111••]. Prosocial and risk associated behavior in probiotic treated mice, a mild analog for novelty-seeking and risk-seeking behaviors in humans, suggests a potential corollary between entrenched behavioral phenotypes and catecholamines (serotonin and dopamine) produced by the gut microbiota [108, 112, 113]. Evolutionary acceleration of the human PFC metabolome divergence from chimpanzees, particularly the dopaminergic synapse [114], reifies the notion that an exaggerated risk-reward complex characterizes human cognitive differentiation, which is facilitated by microbiome derived bioactive compounds. Therefore, quintessentially human behavioral phenotypes in stress, anxiety, and novelty-seeking is additionally reinforced by microbial production of neuroactive compounds. As neurological research expands to include the microbiome, it is increasingly clear that host–microbe interactions have likely played an important role in human brain evolution and development [115•].
Health
The microbiome is essential in immune system development and regulation [51, 52, 116–122], as well as pathogen protection and environmental interfacing [123•, 124], and thus it represents our link to understanding deep evolutionary relationships between human health and ancient ecologies [59, 60, 102, 104, 125]. Our endemic microbiome can mitigate pathogens and pathogenicity by ecological niche exclusion and pro-inflammatory or proliferation signal inhibitions [118, 126]. In doing so, our microbiome also acts as a cohesive unit by exchanging genetic elements such as antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [56•, 104, 127, 128•, 129–131] or by metabolic cross-feeding to influence community structure and mitigate ecological collapse. Increasingly, we realize that our modern behaviors have changed the selective environment and transmission of our microbiome through sanitization and a lack of exposure to environmental or infectious agents, a concept embedded in the now classic ‘hygiene hypothesis’ [132, 133]. A revision of this hypothesis focuses less on exposure to infectious agents, and more on exposure to commensal agents [134], building off of observations that reduced microbial biodiversity associates with autoimmune disease [43, 135•]. Biodiversity compression also provides opportunities for consortia of less beneficial bacteria to impact inflammation directly, inducing complications of metabolic syndrome via alteration of insulin signaling and intestinal permeability through local and systemic induction of cytokines [118, 120]. In addition to bacteria, single and multicellular eukaryotic parasites have also been lost through increased sanitation, but their ecological role within the broader microbiome is less well understood, in part because of the greater difficulty of studying them using molecular methods. Such eukaryotic parasites may influence the host either directly or indirectly by altering microbial ecology. Recently, it was proposed that eukaryotic parasites may positively associate with certain bacterial taxa in the gut [136], but disentangling these patterns from confounding variables such as host residence and subsistence patterns remains a challenge.
Recent research on the vaginal and skin microbiomes has been further instructive on the patterns of immunity and protection conferred by human-associated microbiota. For example, the vaginal microbiota have distinct ecotypes, dominated by different subtypes of lactobacilli, which function to maintain low vaginal pH and high hydrogen peroxide levels. However, functional equivalence is called into question, as different ecotypes confer unequal susceptibility to bacterial vaginosis and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [137••]. Likewise, volatile compounds produced by skin microbes have been found to influence mosquito attraction, and thus may play a role in malaria transmission [138, 139]. These observations have important implications for understanding virulence and disease transmission within a population, as well as strategies for personalized healthcare.
Recent conceptual advancements in understanding the oral microbiome have shifted the conventional view that oral bacteria play a largely neutral or negative role in the oral cavity to one in which the native oral microbiota actively contribute to maintaining oral health [123•], and that disruption of this community is a proximate cause of periodontal disease [140]. We can also witness these disruptions through time in ancient populations by investigating ancient DNA and proteins preserved within semi-fossilized material, such as dental calculus [102, 104], and begin to understand the extent to which our microbiome may rapidly adapt to shifts in human lifestyles, even in the absence of host genetic change.
The human microbiome is recognized as a powerful vector for therapeutic interventions because it is easily manipulated and highly responsive [75•, 78, 141]. Moreover, in addition to playing an important role in maintaining general health, the microbiome also impacts drug efficacy [142] and the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatments [143, 144••]. Therefore, in the wake of a new funding announcement by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) National Microbiome Initiative (NMI) ‘to advance understanding of microbiome behavior and enable protection and restoration of healthy microbiome function’ [145], future human health research will likely expand to include targeted microbial therapies, such as engineered genetic elements, or probiotic ‘seeds’, to manipulate community function and structure. This is where the study of human evolution and microbiome variation can have direct impact on biomedical research.
Ancient microbiome research
The origin of humanity is a major focus of genetic inquiry. Questions about how humans evolved from ancestral apes and what traits were maintained or derived in archaic lineages have driven profound accomplishments in paleogenomics. Technological advances in this field are also now enabling direct comparisons between the gut and oral microbiota of contemporary and ancestral human populations through the study of coprolites (paleofeces) and dental calculus, respectively, and such studies have great potential to reveal the microbial impact of specific environmental and lifestyle changes that have occurred throughout human history and prehistory.
Unlike the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of the host, the microbiome continuously responds to external pressures [75•, 78] as well as internal endocrine and immune signals [107]. Therefore, ancient microbiome data offer snapshots of the health and environmental experience of the host, providing an unprecedented level of detail on the lives of ancient individuals. However, these investigations are still in their infancy. At present, knowledge of ancient human oral and gut microbiota is mainly derived from a relatively small number of specimens dating to the past 8000 years, with the majority of samples originating from Europe and the Americas [3].
The ancient gut microbiome
Current research on contemporary populations primarily focuses on the gut microbiome, in part because it is the largest and arguably most influential bacterial community in the human body. Well-preserved coprolites such as those recovered from the Cueva de los Muertos Chiquitos, a site near Rio Zape, Mexico, have yielded DNA from numerous human gut microbial symbionts [59, 60]. Interestingly, these coprolites also exhibit taxonomic profiles similar to those observed in contemporary rural and traditional human communities [55•, 57, 58, 146], suggesting a relatively stable profile of the human gut microbiome within similar subsistence modalities. However, obtaining ancient microbiome data from coprolite material is challenging. As open systems, gastrointestinal contents and excreted feces rarely preserve in the archeological record, and even morphologically intact specimens, such as mummified intestinal contents and latrine refuse, are highly susceptible to post-depositional alteration. Most coprolite samples that have been investigated to date show evidence of contamination by environmental microbes [59, 147, 148], which, coupled with DNA degradation through time, can result in highly skewed taxonomic reconstructions, especially when using amplicon-based sequencing approaches [149]).
Despite these preservation challenges, however, archaeological coprolite samples are ideally situated to test many hypotheses regarding evolutionary and recent changes in the human gut microbiome. For example, it has been shown that the gut microbiota of Western populations lack several taxa that are commonly found across diverse traditional populations with differing subsistence strategies, [53, 54, 55•, 57], supporting the notion that this loss is recent and occurred due to factors outside of evolutionary processes or early subsistence transitions. It may be possible to clarify the factors driving microbiome changes associated with industrialized society today by analyzing pre-industrial coprolites sourced across different localities, especially from regions such as Europe and Asia, which have an enduring population presence over time and where robust contemporary microbiome data are available. Such a sample set would be critical for addressing whether ancient microbiota from pre-industrialized contexts resemble those observed today among traditional small-scale societies, or whether a temporal shift is present on a global scale, independent of Westernization and lifestyle factors, that would indicate the irreconcilable loss of our ancient microbial selves.
The ancient oral microbiome
Dental calculus is considered a ‘living fossil’ because dental plaque calcifies during the lifetime of the individual, and preservation of this record upon death is not predicated on random diagenetic effects. All humans, and even archaic hominins, produce dental calculus, and its ubiquity in the fossil record has already yielded important discoveries about diet and environment through analysis of microfossils embedded and preserved within the calcified matrix [150, 151]. Thus, in terms of both availability and preservation, dental calculus holds the greatest promise for the large-scale study of ancient micro-biota, enabling the investigation of oral microbiome evolution. For example, given the very high prevalence of periodontal disease in human populations today, investigating the temporal changes that have occurred in the oral microbiome would help focus our attention on the likely factors in the etiology of our modern oral dysbiosis [152]. Dental calculus investigation may inform caries research as well. In a recent study of 34 ancient dental calculus samples from multiple locations in Europe, it was argued that both the dietary transition from hunting and gathering to farming and the expansion of refined foods in the post-industrial diet resulted in shifts in microbiome composition and caused a proliferation of cariogenic taxa [102]. However, currently available data lack the resolution to determine whether these changes seen in the oral micro-biome through time are a direct result of a change in subsistence versus other confounding factors such as geographic location or host genetics. Further, unlike the gut microbiome, the degree to which the oral microbiome responds to environmental and lifestyle stimuli is relatively unknown. Obtaining time series profiles of the oral microbiome within a single location would enable these factors to be independently evaluated. Finally, a more extensive characterization of the oral microbiome among diverse contemporary populations, similar to that currently available for the gut microbiome, is essential to interpreting ancient oral microbiome findings. As we continue to improve our abilities to extract viable microbiome data from ancient samples, we can apply these techniques to dental calculus specimens from as far back in time as our current projections for the survival of ancient DNA [153] to include archaic humans such as Neanderthals and Denisovans.
Pathobionts
In addition to mutualistic microorganisms, the human microbiome is also home to a large number of pathobionts (endogenous potential pathogens), including Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Bordetella pertussis, and Neisseria meningitides [105, 154]. These microbes are responsible for a variety of chronic (e.g., gastritis) and acute (e.g., diphtheria) infections that range from mild (e.g., ear infections) to life-threatening (e.g., bacterial meningitis). With the exception of H. pylori, most of these pathobionts inhabit the oral cavity, although their carriage rates are highly variable and often age-dependent [105]. Several of these pathobionts have been identified in ancient dental calculus [104], and further research may yield insights into the evolution of their pathogenicity [105]. Studies of pathobionts can also reveal information about past human migration events [155, 156]. A recent study of H. pylori recovered from the stomach tissue of the Tyrolean Iceman found that Asian strains predate African strains within Europe, indicating that the hybrid population of H. pylori found in Europe today is a recent development [125]. These studies complement a growing body of research on ancient epidemic pathogens that include the causative agents of plague [157, 158], cholera [159, 160], leprosy [161], smallpox [162], and tuberculosis [163, 164]. Together, paleogenomic investigation of pathobionts and pathogens promise to yield insights into the origins and spread of many clinically-relevant infectious diseases.
Finally, in addition to bacteria, the human microbiome harbors a number of eukaryotic parasites, ranging from unicellular microeukaryotes to multicellular helminths. These parasites are found primarily in the gut and are more prevalent in traditional societies than in industrialized populations. To date, archaeological investigations of parasite loads in ancient human populations have almost exclusively focused on morphological characterizations of helminth eggs and larvae, but taxonomic analyses are greatly aided by the addition of molecular techniques [165].
Future directions
The integration of genomic data obtained from humans and their associated microbiota has great potential to answer key questions posed by evolutionary geneticists and anthropologists, particularly in light of emerging evidence for the critical role played by the human microbiome in dietary ecology, reproductive ecology, immune regulation and disease management, brain growth and development, behavior, and energetics and metabolism. Even more tantalizing is the possibility that, due to the vastly higher diversity of some microbial genes, it may be possible to trace past human dispersals and the effects of environmental variability on fitness. Finally, the emerging availability of micro-biome data from ancient sources has great potential to directly test hypotheses about microbiome evolution and changing ecology throughout human evolutionary history. In redefining what it means to be human, we must expand our queries of human genetic diversity to also encompass the ecological and evolutionary histories of our core microbial members.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-1516633 and BCS-1523264 to C.W.).
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
- 1.Benezra A, DeStefano J, Gordon JI. Anthropology of microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:6378–6381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200515109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Warinner C, Lewis CM., Jr Microbiome and health in past and present human populations. Am Anthropol. 2015;117:740–741. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Warinner C, Speller C, Collins MJ, Lewis CM., Jr Ancient human microbiomes. J Hum Evol. 2015;79:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4•.Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Are we really vastly outnumbered? Revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell. 2016;164:337–340. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013. This article revisits the now classic estimate of the 10:1 ratio of bacterial to human cells in the body and provides new estimates for the size of the human microbiome. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li J, Jia H, Cai X, Zhong H, Feng Q, Sunagawa S, Arumugam M, Kultima JR, Prifti E, Nielsen T, et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:834–841. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Relman DA. The human microbiome and the future practice of medicine. JAMA. 2015;314:1127–1128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:723–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10•.Marchesi JR, Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5. This article defines and redefines key terms in microbiome research. It is a much needed effort to standardize the terminology of the field. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.International Human Genome Sequencing C. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2004;431:931–945. doi: 10.1038/nature03001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Genomes Project C, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kelso J, Prufer K. Ancient humans and the origin of modern humans. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;29:133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meyer M, Arsuaga JL, de Filippo C, Nagel S, Aximu-Petri A, Nickel B, Martinez I, Gracia A, Bermudez de Castro JM, Carbonell E, et al. Nuclear DNA sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de Los Huesos. Nature. 2016;531:504–507. doi: 10.1038/nature17405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chimpanzee S, Analysis C. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:69–87. doi: 10.1038/nature04072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Locke DP, Hillier LW, Warren WC, Worley KC, Nazareth LV, Muzny DM, Yang SP, Wang Z, Chinwalla AT, Minx P, et al. Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes. Nature. 2011;469:529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature09687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prufer K, Munch K, Hellmann I, Akagi K, Miller JR, Walenz B, Koren S, Sutton G, Kodira C, Winer R, et al. The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes. Nature. 2012;486:527–531. doi: 10.1038/nature11128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scally A, Dutheil JY, Hillier LW, Jordan GE, Goodhead I, Herrero J, Hobolth A, Lappalainen T, Mailund T, Marques-Bonet T, et al. Insights into hominid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature. 2012;483:169–175. doi: 10.1038/nature10842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paabo S. The human condition - a molecular approach. Cell. 2014;157:216–226. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vattathil S, Akey JM. Small amounts of archaic admixture provide big insights into human history. Cell. 2015;163:281–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Group NHW, Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, Schloss JA, Bonazzi V, McEwen JE, Wetterstrand KA, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009;19:2317–2323. doi: 10.1101/gr.096651.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pozhitkov AE, Beikler T, Flemmig T, Noble PA. High-throughput methods for analysis of the human oral microbiome. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55:70–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Scholz MB, Lo CC, Chain PS. Next generation sequencing and bioinformatic bottlenecks: the current state of metagenomic data analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24•.Nielsen HB, Almeida M, Juncker AS, Rasmussen S, Li J, Sunagawa S, Plichta DR, Gautier L, Pedersen AG, Le Chatelier E, et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:822–828. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2939. This study leverages gene coabundance profiles across a multiple metagenomic samples to improve de novo, culture-free assembly of microbial genomes. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, Nielsen KL, Tyson GW, Nielsen PH. Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:533–538. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, Yooseph S, Hall AP, Liu SY, Dorrestein PC, Esquenazi E, Hunter RC, Cheng G, et al. Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:244–249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419038112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, Knight R. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:11971–11975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28•.Gilbert SF. A holobiont birth narrative: the epigenetic transmission of the human microbiome. Front Genet. 2014;5:282. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00282. A fundamental revison of how biologists describe and conceptualize mammalian birth. Core features of the birth narrative that are balkanized in obstetric and pediatric practice are reunited in a cohesive evolutionary framework incorporating the microbiome. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brumbaugh DE, Arruda J, Robbins K, Ir D, Santorico SA, Robertson CE, Frank DN. Mode of delivery determines neonatal pharyngeal bacterial composition and early intestinal colonization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Song SJ, Dominguez-Bello MG, Knight R. How delivery mode and feeding can shape the bacterial community in the infant gut. Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185:373–374. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mueller NT, Bakacs E, Combellick J, Grigoryan Z, Dominguez-Bello MG. The infant microbiome development: mom matters. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:237ra265. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Payne MS, Bayatibojakhi S. Exploring preterm birth as a polymicrobial disease: an overview of the uterine microbiome. Front Immunol. 2014;5:595. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prince AL, Antony KM, Chu DM, Aagaard KM. The microbiome, parturition, and timing of birth: more questions than answers. J Reprod Immunol. 2014;104–105:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ardissone AN, de la Cruz DM, Davis-Richardson AG, Rechcigl KT, Li N, Drew JC, Murgas-Torrazza R, Sharma R, Hudak ML, Triplett EW, et al. Meconium microbiome analysis identifies bacteria correlated with premature birth. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36••.Backhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, Feng Q, Jia H, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Li Y, Xia Y, Xie H, Zhong H, et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:852. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.012. Infants born through vaginal birth exhibit greater shared microbial strain diversity with their mothers compared to those born by C-section. The authors also identify cessation of breast-feeding as a major event in the maturation of the infant gut microbiome. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, Fricker AD, Stombaugh J, Knight R, Angenent LT, Ley RE. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4578–4585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Benson AK. Host genetic architecture and the landscape of microbiome composition: humans weigh in. Genome Biol. 2015;16:203. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0775-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39•.Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, Spector TD, Keinan A, Ley RE, Gevers D, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16:191. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1. The authors leverage high throughput shotgun metagenome data from the HMP to identify SNPs in the human genome showing associations with microbiome composition. Several of the identified SNPs were located in immunity-related genes, lending further support to the role of host immunity in modulating microbiome community structure. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Davenport ER. Elucidating the role of the host genome in shaping microbiome composition. Gut Microb. 2016;7:178–184. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1155022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goodrich JK, Davenport ER, Waters JL, Clark AG, Ley RE. Cross-species comparisons of host genetic associations with the microbiome. Science. 2016;352:532–535. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Goodrich JK, Waters JL, Poole AC, Sutter JL, Koren O, Blekhman R, Beaumont M, Van Treuren W, Knight R, Bell JT, et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014;159:789–799. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Knights D, Silverberg MS, Weersma RK, Gevers D, Dijkstra G, Huang H, Tyler AD, van Sommeren S, Imhann F, Stempak JM, et al. Complex host genetics influence the microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Genome Med. 2014;6:107. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0107-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44••.Lewis ZT, Totten SM, Smilowitz JT, Popovic M, Parker E, Lemay DG, Van Tassell ML, Miller MJ, Jin YS, German JB, et al. Maternal fucosyltransferase 2 status affects the gut bifidobacterial communities of breastfed infants. Microbiome. 2015;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0071-z. Mothers capable of secreting 2’-fucosylated glycans in breast milk via active alleles for the fucosyltransferase 2 gene (FUT2), termed ‘secretors’, had nursing infants with an earlier established colony of colonic bifidobacteria, namely B. longum. Non-secretor-fed infants instead positively associated with B. breve colonization. Secretor-infants had lower fecal levels of milk oligosaccharides and higher levels of the metabolic byproduct, lactate, suggesting better utilization of nutritional carbohydrates found in mother’s milk. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Allen-Blevins CR, Sela DA, Hinde K. Milk bioactives may manipulate microbes to mediate parent-offspring conflict. Evol Med Public Health. 2015;2015:106–121. doi: 10.1093/emph/eov007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sela DA, Chapman J, Adeuya A, Kim JH, Chen F, Whitehead TR, Lapidus A, Rokhsar DS, Lebrilla CB, German JB, et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:18964–18969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809584105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sela DA, Mills DA. Nursing our microbiota: molecular linkages between bifidobacteria and milk oligosaccharides. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:298–307. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48••.Smilowitz JT, Lebrilla CB, Mills DA, German JB, Freeman SL. Breast milk oligosaccharides: structure-function relationships in the neonate. Annu Rev Nutr. 2014;34:143–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105721. It is increasingly clear that human breastmilk unique among mammals in its diverse oligosaccharide profile that feeds not the infant but its developing microbiome. This study reviews the current state of knowledge on the composition of human breastmilk and its effects on the developing infant, as well as current technical challenges in characterizing milk glycans. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chichlowski M, De Lartigue G, German JB, Raybould HE, Mills DA. Bifidobacteria isolated from infants and cultured on human milk oligosaccharides affect intestinal epithelial function. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:321–327. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31824fb899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Collado MC, Cernada M, Bauerl C, Vento M, Perez-Martinez G. Microbial ecology and host-microbiota interactions during early life stages. Gut Microb. 2012;3:352–365. doi: 10.4161/gmic.21215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Renz H, Brandtzaeg P, Hornef M. The impact of perinatal immune development on mucosal homeostasis and chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:9–23. doi: 10.1038/nri3112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Simon AK, Hollander GA, McMichael A. Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282:20143085. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.3085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gomez A, Petrzelkova KJ, Burns MB, Yeoman CJ, Amato KR, Vlckova K, Modry D, Todd A, Jost Robinson CA, Remis MJ, et al. Gut microbiome of coexisting BaAka pygmies and bantu reflects gradients of traditional subsistence patterns. Cell Rep. 2016;14:2142–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Martinez I, Stegen JC, Maldonado-Gomez MX, Eren AM, Siba PM, Greenhill AR, Walter J. The gut microbiota of rural papua new guineans: composition, diversity patterns, and ecological processes. Cell Rep. 2015;11:527–538. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55•.Obregon-Tito AJ, Tito RY, Metcalf J, Sankaranarayanan K, Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Zech Xu Z, Van Treuren W, Knight R, Gaffney PM, et al. Subsistence strategies in traditional societies distinguish gut microbiomes. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6505. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7505. Gut microbiome profiles across human populations show a strong clustering influenced primarily by dietary lifestyles. The authors also show that strains of the bacterial genus Treponema, a common member of the traditional human gut microbiome, share phylogenetic and functional potential similarities with other apathogenic, commensal Treponema spp. isolated from pig and termite guts. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56•.Rampelli S, Schnorr SL, Consolandi C, Turroni S, Severgnini M, Peano C, Brigidi P, Crittenden AN, Henry AG, Candela M. Metagenome sequencing of the Hadza hunter-gatherer gut microbiota. Curr Biol. 2015;25:1682–1693. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.055. Shotgun metagenome sequencing of fecal gut microbiota from African hunter-gatherers and urban-living Italians illustrates significant differences in the pattern of microbial gene abundances, particularly for carbohydrate and protein metabolism. A survey of antibiotic resistance genes and transfer elements also exposes a shared predilection of microbial communities to harbor robust resistance profiles, but resulting from different selective factors. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schnorr SL, Candela M, Rampelli S, Centanni M, Consolandi C, Basaglia G, Turroni S, Biagi E, Peano C, Severgnini M, et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3654. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tito RY, Knights D, Metcalf J, Obregon-Tito AJ, Cleeland L, Najar F, Roe B, Reinhard K, Sobolik K, Belknap S, et al. Insights from characterizing extinct human gut microbiomes. PLoS One. 2012:7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tito RY, Macmil S, Wiley G, Najar F, Cleeland L, Qu CM, Wang P, Romagne F, Leonard S, Ruiz AJ, et al. Phylotyping and functional analysis of two ancient human microbiomes. PLoS One. 2008:3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61••.Sonnenburg ED, Smits SA, Tikhonov M, Higginbottom SK, Wingreen NS, Sonnenburg JL. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature16504. Shifts in levels of dietary fiber result in marked decreases of specific bacterial taxa within humanized mice. Recovery of lost microbial taxa was only achieved through a combination of diet alteration (high fiber) and re-introduction of taxa through fecal gavages from mice bred purely on high fiber diets. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320:1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1165. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nayfach S, Pollard KS. Population genetic analyses of metagenomes reveal extensive strain-level variation in prevalent human-associated bacteria. bioRxiv. 2015:031757. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Carmody RN, Turnbaugh PJ. Host-microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4173–4181. doi: 10.1172/JCI72335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Milton K. Primate diets and gut morphology: implications for hominid evolution. In: Harris M, Ross EB, editors. Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits. Temple University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pontzer H, Brown MH, Raichlen DA, Dunsworth H, Hare B, Walker K, Luke A, Dugas LR, Durazo-Arvizu R, Schoeller D, et al. Metabolic acceleration and the evolution of human brain size and life history. Nature. 2016;533:390–392. doi: 10.1038/nature17654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Aiello LC, Wheeler P. The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis — the Brain and the Digestive-System in Human and Primate Evolution. Curr Anthropol. 1995;36:199–221. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:667–685. doi: 10.1038/nri3738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schloissnig S, Arumugam M, Sunagawa S, Mitreva M, Tap J, Zhu A, Waller A, Mende DR, Kultima JR, Martin J, et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2013;493:45–50. doi: 10.1038/nature11711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhu L, Wu Q, Dai J, Zhang S, Wei F. Evidence of cellulose metabolism by the giant panda gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:17714–17719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017956108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Davenport ER, Mizrahi-Man O, Michelini K, Barreiro LB, Ober C, Gilad Y. Seasonal variation in human gut microbiome composition. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Org E, Parks BW, Joo JW, Emert B, Schwartzman W, Kang EY, Mehrabian M, Pan C, Knight R, Gunsalus R, et al. Genetic and environmental control of host-gut microbiota interactions. Genome Res. 2015;25:1558–1569. doi: 10.1101/gr.194118.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cantarel BL, Lombard V, Henrissat B. Complex carbohydrate utilization by the healthy human microbiome. PLoS One. 2012;7:e28742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75•.David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. Consistent changes in microbial community structure and gene expression are observed in response to changes in diet from plant-based to animal-based food sources and vice-versa. The microbial community changes are driven by a selection for bile-tolerant organisms (animal-based diets) or carbohydrate metabolizers (plant-based diets). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Delsuc F, Metcalf JL, Wegener Parfrey L, Song SJ, Gonzalez A, Knight R. Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:1301–1317. doi: 10.1111/mec.12501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, Almeida M, Arumugam M, Batto JM, Kennedy S, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–546. doi: 10.1038/nature12506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.David LA, Materna AC, Friedman J, Campos-Baptista MI, Blackburn MC, Perrotta A, Erdman SE, Alm EJ. Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R89. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-7-r89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nguyen TLA, Vieira-Silva S, Liston A, Raes J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis Models Mech. 2015;8:1–16. doi: 10.1242/dmm.017400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kumar A, Alrefai WA, Borthakur A, Dudeja PK. Lactobacillus acidophilus counteracts enteropathogenic E. coli-induced inhibition of butyrate uptake in intestinal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;309:G602–G607. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00186.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81•.Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta)genomic data. MBio. 2014;5:e00889. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00889-14. The authors demonstrate the presence of butyrate biosynthesis pathways across a diverse range of taxa not limited to Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.LeBlanc JG, Milani C, de Giori GS, Sesma F, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: a gut microbiota perspective. CurrOpin Biotechnol. 2013;24:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Magnusdottir S, Ravcheev D, de Crecy-Lagard V, Thiele I. Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes. Front Genet. 2015;6:148. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gerard P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens. 2013;3:14–24. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sankaranarayanan K, Ozga AT, Warinner C, Tito RY, Obregon-Tito AJ, Xu J, Gaffney PM, Jervis LL, Cox D, Stephens L, et al. Gut microbiome diversity among Cheyenne and Arapaho individuals from western Oklahoma. Curr Biol. 2015;25:3161–3169. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86••.De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Goncalves D, Vinera J, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, Backhed F, Mithieux G. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell. 2014;156:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.016. The regulation of intestinal gluconeogenesis (IGN) by butyrate and propionate were found to have two different but complementary mechanisms, the former reliant on cAMP signaling in the gut, and the latter through gut-brain communication via FFAR3 (free fatty acid receptor). The relevance of these findings are that energy generation and regulation by microbial byproducts are tightly controlled and communicative with somatic insulin sensitivity and satiety signals that help promote host metabolic health. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Caminero A, Herran AR, Nistal E, Perez-Andres J, Vaquero L, Vivas S, Ruiz de Morales JM, Albillos SM, Casqueiro J. Diversity of the cultivable human gut microbiome involved in gluten metabolism: isolation of microorganisms with potential interest for coeliac disease. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;88:309–319. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fernandez-Feo M, Wei G, Blumenkranz G, Dewhirst FE, Schuppan D, Oppenheim FG, Helmerhorst EJ. The cultivable human oral gluten-degrading microbiome and its potential implications in coeliac disease and gluten sensitivity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E386–E394. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.He T, Venema K, Priebe MG, Welling GW, Brummer RJ, Vonk RJ. The role of colonic metabolism in lactose intolerance. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38:541–547. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hehemann JH, Correc G, Barbeyron T, Helbert W, Czjzek M, Michel G. Transfer of carbohydrate-active enzymes from marine bacteria to Japanese gut microbiota. Nature. 2010;464:908–912. doi: 10.1038/nature08937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Martens EC, Lowe EC, Chiang H, Pudlo NA, Wu M, McNulty NP, Abbott DW, Henrissat B, Gilbert HJ, Bolam DN, et al. Recognition and degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides by two human gut symbionts. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sellitto M, Bai G, Serena G, Fricke WF, Sturgeon C, Gajer P, White JR, Koenig SS, Sakamoto J, Boothe D, et al. Proof of concept of microbiome-metabolome analysis and delayed gluten exposure on celiac disease autoimmunity in genetically at-risk infants. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhang M, Tong W, Chen J, Zhang Y, Li S. Metabolically healthy obesity and its associates in Mongolian Chinese adults. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014;12:185–190. doi: 10.1089/met.2013.0102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, Karst F. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:2091–2102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Carrigan MA, Uryasev O, Frye CB, Eckman BL, Myers CR, Hurley TD, Benner SA. Hominids adapted to metabolize ethanol long before human-directed fermentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA. 2015;112:458–463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404167111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gerbault P, Liebert A, Itan Y, Powell A, Currat M, Burger J, Swallow DM, Thomas MG. Evolution of lactase persistence: an example of human niche construction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:863–877. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ingram CJ, Mulcare CA, Itan Y, Thomas MG, Swallow DM. Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence. Hum Genet. 2009;124:579–591. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0593-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Warinner C, Hendy J, Speller C, Cappellini E, Fischer R, Trachsel C, Arneborg J, Lynnerup N, Craig OE, Swallow DM, et al. Direct evidence of milk consumption from ancient human dental calculus. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7104. doi: 10.1038/srep07104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Curry A. Archaeology: the milk revolution. Nature. 2013;500:20–22. doi: 10.1038/500020a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Salque M, Bogucki PI, Pyzel J, Sobkowiak-Tabaka I, Grygiel R, Szmyt M, Evershed RP. Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe. Nature. 2013;493:522–525. doi: 10.1038/nature11698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cornejo OE, Lefebure T, Bitar PD, Lang P, Richards VP, Eilertson K, Do T, Beighton D, Zeng L, Ahn SJ, et al. Evolutionary and population genomics of the cavity causing bacteria. Streptococcus mutans Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:881–893. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Adler CJ, Dobney K, Weyrich LS, Kaidonis J, Walker AW, Haak W, Bradshaw CJ, Townsend G, Soltysiak A, Alt KW, et al. Sequencing ancient calcified dental plaque shows changes in oral microbiota with dietary shifts of the Neolithic and Industrial revolutions. Nat Genet. 2013;45:450–455. doi: 10.1038/ng.2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.De La Fuente CP, Flores SV, Moraga ML. Human bacterial DNA from dental calculus: a new source of genetic material. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;147:127. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Warinner C, Rodrigues JF, Vyas R, Trachsel C, Shved N, Grossmann J, Radini A, Hancock Y, Tito RY, Fiddyment S, et al. Pathogens and host immunity in the ancient human oral cavity. Nat Genet. 2014;46:336–344. doi: 10.1038/ng.2906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Warinner C. Dental calculus and the evolution of the human oral microbiome. Calif Dental Assoc J. 2016;44:411–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Dinan TG, Stilling RM, Stanton C, Cryan JF. Collective unconscious: how gut microbes shape human behavior. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;63:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:306–314. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sampson TR, Mazmanian SK. Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, Shastri GG, Ann P, Ma L, Nagler CR, Ismagilov RF, Mazmanian SK, Hsiao EY. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell. 2015;161:264–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110•.Gacias M, Gaspari S, Mae-Santos P, Tamburini S, Andrade M, Zang F, Shen N, Tolstikov V, Kiebish MA, Dupree JL, et al. Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior. Elife. 2016:5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13442. Microbiota were found to modify transcriptional changes, through the actions of the metabolite cresol, on oligodendrocyte myelin gene expression in mice prefrontal cortex. Reduced myelin gene expression resulted in social avoidance behavior, suggesting that gut microbiota can directly modify brain specific developments that alters expression of prosocial behavior, which is an important human trait relating to cognitive benchmarks. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111••.Hoban AE, Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Claesson MJ, Clarke G, Cryan JF. Regulation of prefrontal cortex myelination by the microbiota. Transl Psychiatr. 2016;6:e774. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.42. Using germ free mice and a genome-wide transcription profile, researchers found that in the absence of gut microbiota, GF mice showed a concerted upregulation of prefrontal cortex genes related to myelination and plasticity, resulting in axonal hypermyelination, and other signatures of heightened neural activity, while downregulated genes included those relating to immune and defense. Myelination transcriptional changes were abolished upon colonization with a conventional microbiota post weaning. These results demonstrate that appropriate control of prefrontal cortex myelination is dependent on the gut microbiota through a critical developmental window for neuronal development. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Asano Y, Hiramoto T, Nishino R, Aiba Y, Kimura T, Yoshihara K, Koga Y, Sudo N. Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G1288–G1295. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00341.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol Psychiatr. 2014;19:146–148. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bozek K, Wei Y, Yan Z, Liu X, Xiong J, Sugimoto M, Tomita M, Paabo S, Pieszek R, Sherwood CC, et al. Exceptional evolutionary divergence of human muscle and brain metabolomes parallels human cognitive and physical uniqueness. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115•.Stilling RM, Bordenstein SR, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:147. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00147. This study reexamines fundamental concepts in brain development in light of the hologenome theory of evolution. A tour de force of cognitive, social, and behavioral evidence for the role of microbes in the neurological development, function, and fitness of complex organisms, including humans. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Beura LK, Hamilton SE, Bi K, Schenkel JM, Odumade OA, Casey KA, Thompson EA, Fraser KA, Rosato PC, Filali-Mouhim A, et al. Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice. Nature. 2016;532:512–516. doi: 10.1038/nature17655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Gomez de Aguero M, Ganal-Vonarburg SC, Fuhrer T, Rupp S, Uchimura Y, Li H, Steinert A, Heikenwalder M, Hapfelmeier S, Sauer U, et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science. 2016;351:1296–1302. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science. 2012;336:1268–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1223490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lathrop SK, Bloom SM, Rao SM, Nutsch K, Lio CW, Santacruz N, Peterson DA, Stappenbeck TS, Hsieh CS. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. 2011;478:250–254. doi: 10.1038/nature10434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.McDermott AJ, Huffnagle GB. The microbiome and regulation of mucosal immunity. Immunology. 2014;142:24–31. doi: 10.1111/imm.12231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Kato LM, Kawamoto S, Maruya M, Fagarasan S. The role of the adaptive immune system in regulation of gut microbiota. Immunol Rev. 2014;260:67–75. doi: 10.1111/imr.12185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Maynard CL, Elson CO, Hatton RD, Weaver CT. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature. 2012;489:231–241. doi: 10.1038/nature11551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123•.Kumar PS, Mason MR. Mouthguards: does the indigenous microbiome play a role in maintaining oral health? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:35. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00035. Much attention has been given to the gut microbiome, but the oral microbiome is also implicated in numerous aspects of human health. This study examines the role of oral microbiota in colonization resistance, immune system education, epithelial barrier function, and reconsiders the impact of these functions on oral and systemic health. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zaura E, Nicu EA, Krom BP, Keijser BJ. Acquiring and maintaining a normal oral microbiome: current perspective. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:85. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Maixner F, Krause-Kyora B, Turaev D, Herbig A, Hoopmann MR, Hallows JL, Kusebauch U, Vigl EE, Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, et al. The 5300-year-old Helicobacter pylori genome of the Iceman. Science. 2016;351:162–165. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Brestoff JR, Artis D. Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:676–684. doi: 10.1038/ni.2640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Clemente JC, Pehrsson EC, Blaser MJ, Sandhu K, Gao Z, Wang B, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Contreras M, Noya-Alarcon O, et al. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians. Sci Adv. 2015:1. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128•.Pehrsson EC, Tsukayama P, Patel S, Mejia-Bautista M, Sosa-Soto G, Navarrete KM, Calderon M, Cabrera L, Hoyos-Arango W, Bertoli MT, et al. Interconnected microbiomes and resistomes in low-income human habitats. Nature. 2016;533:212–216. doi: 10.1038/nature17672. The authors mapped the extent of microbial resistance genes, or resistomes, across low-income Latin American communities, inclusive of human fecal samples and environmental samples. Key resistance genes with greater association to mobile genetic elements were found to cross habitat boundaries, unlike the general resistome structures, implying human-induced propagation of virulent antibiotic resistances across human and non-human environments, and a need for risk assessments inclusive of antibiotic resistance threats. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Sommer MO, Dantas G, Church GM. Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora. Science. 2009;325:1128–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.1176950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:417–433. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Roberts AP, Mullany P. Oral biofilms: a reservoir of transferable, bacterial, antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:1441–1450. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Bendiks M, Kopp MV. The relationship between advances in understanding the microbiome and the maturing hygiene hypothesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:487–494. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0382-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989;299:1259–1260. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Haahtela T, Holgate S, Pawankar R, Akdis CA, Benjaponpitak S, Caraballo L, Demain J, Portnoy J, von Hertzen L, Change WAOSCoC, et al. The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: world allergy organization position statement. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-6-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135•.Kostic AD, Gevers D, Siljander H, Vatanen T, Hyotylainen T, Hamalainen AM, Peet A, Tillmann V, Poho P, Mattila I, et al. The dynamics of the human infant gut microbiome in development and in progression toward type 1 diabetes. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:260–273. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.001. Focusing on at-risk infants, the study demonstrates early differences in microbial community richness, with infants having type 1 diabetes consistently showing reduced species richness. Specifically, this decrease in diversity preceded onset of type 1 diabetes, and is also characterized by increased abundance of inflammation-associated microbes and metabolic pathways. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Morton ER, Lynch J, Froment A, Lafosse S, Heyer E, Przeworski M, Blekhman R, Segurel L. Variation in rural African gut microbiota is strongly correlated with colonization by entamoeba and subsistence. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137••.Borgdorff H, Tsivtsivadze E, Verhelst R, Marzorati M, Jurriaans S, Ndayisaba GF, Schuren FH, van de Wijgert JH. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J. 2014;8:1781–1793. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.26. A key study on the role of the microbiome in host defense, it demonstrates that certain vaginal ecotypes, specifically those dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus, are associated with reduced pathogen transmission and infection. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Verhulst NO, Andriessen R, Groenhagen U, Bukovinszkine Kiss G, Schulz S, Takken W, van Loon JJ, Schraa G, Smallegange RC. Differential attraction of malaria mosquitoes to volatile blends produced by human skin bacteria. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Verhulst NO, Qiu YT, Beijleveld H, Maliepaard C, Knights D, Schulz S, Berg-Lyons D, Lauber CL, Verduijn W, Haasnoot GW, et al. Composition of human skin microbiota affects attractiveness to malaria mosquitoes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Bartold PM, Van Dyke TE. Periodontitis: a host-mediated disruption of microbial homeostasis. Unlearning learned concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2013;62:203–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00450.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:693–702. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Anderson KC, Schwartz MD, Lieu SO. Antibiotics and OC effectiveness. JAAPA. 2013;26:11. doi: 10.1097/01720610-201301000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Karin M, Jobin C, Balkwill F. Chemotherapy, immunity and microbiota - a new triumvirate? Nat Med. 2014;20:126–127. doi: 10.1038/nm.3473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144••.Viaud S, Daillere R, Boneca IG, Lepage P, Langella P, Chamaillard M, Pittet MJ, Ghiringhelli F, Trinchieri G, Goldszmid R, et al. Gut microbiome and anticancer immune response: really hot Sh*t! Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:199–214. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.56. The title is not an exaggeration — it is now clear that the gut microbiome greatly influences the outcome of cancer therapy, including both the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatment and the extent of its side effects, such as neuropathy. The study details the core role of the gut in systemic immune system function. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.The White House: FACT SHEET: Announcing the National Microbiome Initiative. Washington, D.C: 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/05/12/fact-sheet-announcing-national-microbiome-initiative. [Google Scholar]
- 146.De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, Collini S, Pieraccini G, Lionetti P. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14691–14696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005963107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Appelt S, Armougom F, Le Bailly M, Robert C, Drancourt M. Polyphasic analysis of a middle ages coprolite microbiota. Belgium. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Fornaciari G, Luciani S, Dowd SE, Toranzos GA, Marota I, Cano RJ. Gut Microbiome of an 11th Century A.D. Pre-Columbian Andean Mummy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Ziesemer KA, Mann AE, Sankaranarayanan K, Schroeder H, Ozga AT, Brandt BW, Zaura E, Waters-Rist A, Hoogland M, Salazar-Garcia DC, et al. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16498. doi: 10.1038/srep16498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR. Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:486–491. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016868108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Henry AG, Ungar PS, Passey BH, Sponheimer M, Rossouw L, Bamford M, Sandberg P, de Ruiter DJ, Berger L. The diet of Australopithecus sediba. Nature. 2012;487:90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature11185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology. 2003;149:279–294. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Allentoft ME, Collins M, Harker D, Haile J, Oskam CL, Hale ML, Campos PF, Samaniego JA, Gilbert MT, Willerslev E, et al. The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279:4724–4733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.de Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Sanders EA, Bogaert D. The role of the local microbial ecosystem in respiratory health and disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015:370. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Dominguez-Bello MG, Blaser MJ. The Human Microbiota as a Marker for Migrations of Individuals and Populations. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2011;40:451–474. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Henne K, Li J, Stoneking M, Kessler O, Schilling H, Sonanini A, Conrads G, Horz HP. Global analysis of saliva as a source of bacterial genes for insights into human population structure and migration studies. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:190. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0190-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Bos KI, Schuenemann VJ, Golding GB, Burbano HA, Waglechner N, Coombes BK, McPhee JB, DeWitte SN, Meyer M, Schmedes S, et al. A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death. Nature. 2011;478:506–510. doi: 10.1038/nature10549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Rasmussen S, Allentoft ME, Nielsen K, Orlando L, Sikora M, Sjogren KG, Pedersen AG, Schubert M, Van Dam A, Kapel CM, et al. Early divergent strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 years ago. Cell. 2015;163:571–582. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Devault AM, McLoughlin K, Jaing C, Gardner S, Porter TM, Enk JM, Thissen J, Allen J, Borucki M, DeWitte SN, et al. Ancient pathogen DNA in archaeological samples detected with a Microbial Detection Array. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4245. doi: 10.1038/srep04245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Devault AM, Golding GB, Waglechner N, Enk JM, Kuch M, Tien JH, Shi M, Fisman DN, Dhody AN, Forrest S, et al. Second-pandemic strain of Vibrio cholerae from the Philadelphia cholera outbreak of 1849. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:334–340. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Schuenemann VJ, Singh P, Mendum TA, Krause-Kyora B, Jager G, Bos KI, Herbig A, Economou C, Benjak A, Busso P, et al. Genome-wide comparison of medieval and modern Mycobacterium leprae. Science. 2013;341:179–183. doi: 10.1126/science.1238286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Biagini P, Theves C, Balaresque P, Geraut A, Cannet C, Keyser C, Nikolaeva D, Gerard P, Duchesne S, Orlando L, et al. Variola virus in a 300-year-old Siberian mummy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2057–2059. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1208124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Bos KI, Harkins KM, Herbig A, Coscolla M, Weber N, Comas I, Forrest SA, Bryant JM, Harris SR, Schuenemann VJ, et al. Pre-Columbian mycobacterial genomes reveal seals as a source of New World human tuberculosis. Nature. 2014;514:494–497. doi: 10.1038/nature13591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Bouwman AS, Kennedy SL, Muller R, Stephens RH, Holst M, Caffell AC, Roberts CA, Brown TA. Genotype of a historic strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:18511–18516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209444109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Cleeland LM, Reichard MV, Tito RY, Reinhard KJ, Lewis CM. Clarifying prehistoric parasitism from a complementary morphological and molecular approach. J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40:3060–3066. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ., Jr Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:486–505. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.486-505.2002. table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Jr, Rickard AH, Jakubovics NS, Chalmers NI, Diaz PI. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol 2000. 2006;42:47–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Scannapieco FA, Solomon L, Wadenya RO. Emergence in human dental plaque and host distribution of amylase-binding streptococci. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1627–1635. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730100701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Whittaker CJ, Klier CM, Kolenbrander PE. Mechanisms of adhesion by oral bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:513–552. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kasubuchi M, Hasegawa S, Hiramatsu T, Ichimura A, Kimura I. Dietary gut microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, and host metabolic regulation. Nutrients. 2015;7:2839–2849. doi: 10.3390/nu7042839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Moeller AH, Li Y, Mpoudi Ngole E, Ahuka-Mundeke S, Lonsdorf EV, Pusey AE, Peeters M, Hahn BH, Ochman H. Rapid changes in the gut microbiome during human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:16431–16435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419136111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Moeller AH, Peeters M, Ndjango JB, Li Y, Hahn BH, Ochman H. Sympatric chimpanzees and gorillas harbor convergent gut microbial communities. Genome Res. 2013;23:1715–1720. doi: 10.1101/gr.154773.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



