Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;7(5):e1129. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.96

Table 3. Correlational analyses.

  Contrast estimates GMV right temporal pole (adjusted for age, education, verbal IQ, site and nonsexual offenses)
  P−CSO P+CSO HC Entire sample
SES −0.075 (N=59) 0.017 (N=53) −0.126 (N=98) −0.029 (N=210)
SIS-1 −0.087 (N=59) −0.281* (N=53) −0.256* (N=98) −0.152* (N=210)
SIS-2 0.244 (*) (N=59) −0.115 (N=59) −0.071 (N=98) 0.016 (N=210)
SPF-IRI_PT 0.078 (N=58) 0.038 (N=52) −0.070 (N=98) −0.018 (N=208)
SPF-IRI_EC 0.239 (*) (N=58) −0.048 (N=52) −0.064 (N=98) 0.010 (N=208)
2D:4D ratio 0.148 (N=46) −0.220 (N=44) 0.164 (N=95) 0.128 (N=189)
VRT index for pedophilia 0.017 (N=59) −0.088 (N=58) −0.202* (N=100) −0.114 (*) (N=217)

Abbreviations: 2D:4D ratio, second-to-fourth digit ratio; GMV, gray matter volume; HC, healthy controls; IQ, intelligence quotient; P+CSO, pedophiles with a history of child sexual offending; P−CSO, pedophiles without a history of child sexual offending; SES, sexual excitation proneness; SIS-1, sexual inhibition due to threat of performance failure; SIS-2, sexual inhibition proneness due to negative consequences; SPF-IRI, Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragen based on the interpersonal reactivity index scores on perspective taking (PT) and empathic concern (EC); VRT index, viewing reaction time index.

Pearson’s correlation coefficients. *P<0.05; (*)P<0.10.