Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;38(7):764–777. doi: 10.1002/humu.23233

Table 5.

Sensitivity and specificity of WFS1 genotype to predict phenotype

Phenotype Genotype Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Positive predictive value (95% CI) Negative predictive value (95% CI)
Wolfram syndrome Group 1 79 (75, 83) 92 (83, 97) 98 (95, 99) 47 (39, 55)
Group 2 21 (17, 25) 8 (3, 17) 53 (45, 61) 2 (1, 5)
WFS1‐related disorders (recessive form) Group 1 43 (19, 70) 32 (28, 37) 2 (1, 5) 95 (89, 97)
Group 2 57 (30,81) 68 (63, 72) 5 (3, 11) 98 (95, 99)
WFS1‐related disorders (dominant form) Group 1 0 (0, 7) 22 (18, 27) 0 (0, 2) 58 (50, 66)
Group 2 100 (93, 100) 78 (73, 82) 42 (34, 50) 100 (98, 100)

CI, confidence interval.

Notes: Group 1: variants predicted to cause complete or partial loss of function (N‐terminal nonsense and frameshifts, splice‐site variants predicted to cause exon skipping/deletions; C‐terminal nonsense and frameshift; N‐terminal small in‐frame deletions/duplications/insertions/indels); or compound heterozygous where one variant is predicted to cause complete and the other a partial loss of function.

Group 2: variants predicted to cause minor loss of function (missense, C‐terminal small in‐frame deletions/duplications/insertions/indels) or compound heterozygous for a variant predicted to cause partial and minor loss of function.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was calculated using VassarStats Clinical calculator 1 (www.vassarstats.net).