Figure 2.

(A) Total Fugl–Meyer (F–M) scores across visits 1–5. There was a significant change in F–M score that was driven by the F–M by Group interaction; (B) F–M subscale rating passive and active range of motion. There was a significant F–M by Group interaction; (C) F–M subscale rating pain during passive range of motion showing a significant F–M by Group interaction; (D) F–M subscale rating hand function and grasp. There was a significant overall change in this score in F–M, but no significant interaction.