Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jan 22;25(4):363–371. doi: 10.1002/pds.3959

Table 2.

Data input for benefit-harm assessment

Patient experiences with treatment outcomes over time for the two randomized treatment groups
Implant therapy group

Number of patients, n/N (%)
Systemic therapy group

Number of patients, n/N
(%)
Visual acuity of the better-seeing eye remained at worse than 20/40 or decreased to worse than 20/40 at each time point
  6 months 33/121 (27%) 28/115 (24%)
  12 months 37/119 (31%) 24/115 (21%)
  18 months 29/114 (25%) 21/117 (18%)
  24 months 33/118 (28%) 24/114 (21%)
Number of patients who ever had the event(s) at each time point
Incident glaucoma
  6 months 0/116 (0%) 0/115 (0%)
  12 months 1/116 (1%) 0/115 (0%)
  18 months 1/116 (1%) 0/114 (0%)
  24 months 27/116 (23%) 7/114 (6%)
Requiring cataract surgery
  6 months 23/124 (19%) 6/121 (5%)
  12 months 43/124 (35%) 16/120 (13%)
  18 months 65/123 (53%) 25/120 (21%)
  24 months 74/121 (61%) 30/119 (25%)
Requiring glaucoma surgery
  6 months 8/124 (6%) 3/121 (2%)
  12 months 21/124 (17%) 3/120 (3%)
  18 months 33/123 (27%) 4/120 (3%)
  24 months 40/121 (33%) 8/119 (7%)
Incident cataracts
  6 months 11/24 (46%) 5/21 (24%)
  12 months 22/24 (92%) 8/21 (38%)
  18 months 22/24 (92%) 8/21 (38%)
  24 months 23/24 (96%) 10/21 (48%)
Prescription-requiring hypertension
  6 months 2/124 (2%) 3/121 (2%)
  12 months 4/124 (3%) 4/120 (3%)
  18 months 4/123 (3%) 5/120 (4%)
  24 months 5/121 (4%) 9/119 (8%)
Prescription-requiring hyperlipidemia
  6 months 1/124 (1%) 3/121 (2%)
  12 months 2/124 (2%) 3/120 (3%)
  18 months 3/123 (2%) 7/120 (6%)
  24 months 3/121 (2%) 8/119 (7%)
Prescription-requiring infections
  6 months 25/124 (20%) 27/121 (22%)
  12 months 32/124 (26%) 38/120 (32%)
  18 months 38/123 (31%) 52/120 (43%)
  24 months 45/122 (37%) 57/119 (48%)
Weights assigned in the main and sensitivity analyses

Outcome Main analysis
(weights obtained from
the patient preferences
survey)*
Sensitivity
analysis one
Sensitivity
analysis two
Visual acuity of the better-seeing eyes remained at worse than 20/40 or decreased to worse than 20/40 0.8 1.0 1.0
Incident glaucoma 0.7 1.0 0.5
Requiring cataract surgery 0.6 1.0 0.5
Requiring glaucoma surgery 0.6 1.0 0.5
Incident cataracts 0.3 0.5 0.25
Prescription-requiring hypertension 0.3 0.5 0.25
Prescription-requiring hyperlipidemia 0.3 0.5 0.25
Prescription-requiring infections 0.2 0.5 0.25
*

The preference estimates are on a −5 to 5 scale. We rescaled the median of the preference estimates to a 0 to1 scale. For example, the median of the preference estimate of incident glaucoma is 2, and the weights we assigned in analysis is 2-(−5)/10, or 0.7.