Table 5.
Overview of calibration, validation, and evaluation datasets with percentage (%) of gauging stations that performed according to Moriasi et al. (2007b) PBIAS model performance classes. The symbol # represents the number of gauging stations.
| Dataseta | Data Type | # gauging stations | # data entries (period) | PBIAS performance class |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | ||||
| (% of gauging stations) | |||||||
| C | Q (m3/s) | 264 | 37,074 (1995–2006) |
36 | 12 | 22 | 30 |
| V | 708 | 126,375 (1995–2009) |
33 | 11 | 17 | 39 | |
| C | N-NO3 (mg/L) | 340 | 36,120 (1995–2009) |
23 | 17 | 26 | 34 |
| E | N-NO3 (ton/month) | 202 | 21,666 (1995–2009) |
26 | 15 | 33 | 27 |
| C | TN (mg/L) | 191 | 34,380 (1995–2009) |
38 | 12 | 24 | 27 |
| E | TN (ton/month) | 121 | 5825 (1995–2009) |
35 | 11 | 26 | 28 |
| C | TP (mg/L) | 333 | 59,940 (1995–2009) |
25 | 11 | 12 | 52 |
| E | TP (ton/month) | 202 | 21,094 (1995–2009) |
22 | 16 | 22 | 41 |
a
C = calibration; V = Validation; E = evaluation.