Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;8(9):1507–1516. doi: 10.7150/jca.19175

Table 5.

Japanese reports of the effect of muscle mass evaluated by CT on clinical outcome for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Author Year No. of cases HCC therapy Evaluation method for muscle mass Prevalence of muscle mass loss Outcome
Our study 2017 182 RFA CT (L3, PMI) 49.5% P<0.05 (OS)
Hiraoka, et al. [31] 2016 93 Sorafenib CT (L3, PMI) 21.5% P=0.042 (OS)
Kamachi, et al. [18] 2016 92 Surgery or RFA CT (L3, SMI) 66.3% P<0.05 (RFS)
Iritani, et al. [32] 2015 217 Any CT (L3, SMI) 11.1% P<0.05 (OS)
Fujiwara, et al. [15] 2015 1257 RFA or TACE CT (L3, SMI) 11.1% P<0.05 (OS)
Hamaguchi, et al. [20] 2014 200 LT CT (L3, PMI) 44.0% P<0.05 (OS)
Ito, et al. [14] 2014 190 Surgery CT (L3, SMI) 40.5% P<0.05 (OS)
Harimoto, et al. [17] 2013 186 Surgery CT (L3, SMI) 40.3% P<0.05 (OS)

CT; computed tomography, RFA; radiofrequency ablation, L3; the third lumber, PMI; psoas muscle index, SMI; skeletal muscle index, TACE; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, LT; liver transplantation, OS; overall survival, RFS; recurrence free survival.