Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;18(7):1435. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071435

Table 2.

Anticancer drug resistance profiles (EC50) of the cells.

Compounds EC50
Mock WT M184K N297S K304N P403L E757K
ATRA (μM) 40.0 ± 10.1 42.1 ± 4.8 43.4 ± 3.2 48.1 ± 8.0 40.3 ± 4.8 41.0 ± 2.9 42.0 ± 4.3
Azathioprine (μM) 4.2 ± 1.0 21.5 ± 1.0 * 14.3 ± 1.8 *,** 12.6 ± 2.4 *,** 12.6 ± 2.2 *,** 17.9 ± 1.0 * 15.2 ± 3.3 *,**
Etoposide (nM) 204.9 ± 16.2 256.6 ± 31.7 210.3 ± 13.2 254.1 ± 28.2 326.3 ± 33.6 * 321.0 ± 14.6 * 208.4 ± 17.9
5-FU (μM) 7.7 ± 1.4 6.3 ± 2.2 11.1 ± 1.4 4.5 ± 1.2 11.0 ± 2.7 4.3 ± 1.0 5.9 ± 1.2
6-Mercaptopurine (μM) 1.9 ± 0.4 9.1 ± 1.8 * 6.4 ± 0.7 * 6.6 ± 0.9 * 4.6 ± 0.3 ** 6.4 ± 0.5 * 5.1 ± 1.4 **
SN-38 (nM) 8.7 ± 1.1 45.5 ± 10.2 * 50.2 ± 6.6 * 29.5 ± 8.5 * 22.5 ± 0.3 ** 24.4 ± 7.4 ** 21.6 ± 1.6 **
Vincristine (nM) 2.9 ± 1.1 1.6 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.3

Definitions: ATRA, All-trans-retinoic acid; 5-FU, 5-Fluorouracil; SN-38, 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin. The drug resistance properties of cells established using the Flp-In™ system were evaluated, as described in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean values ± S.D. (n = 3–6). Statistical analyses for significance were performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (* p < 0.01 compared to the Mock group; ** p < 0.01 compared with the wild type (WT)).