Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2017 Feb 28;19(3):221–242. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2017.1291696

Table 1.

Partial Correlations between ratings of attachment with indicators of emotion in each stage of the experiment, controlling for condition (presence of pet dog) and gender

Baseline (N=99) Preparation (N=99) Speech (N=99) Rest (N=98)
Positive affect Security .17* .24** .13 .22**
Avoidance −.08 −.21** −.08 −.12
Ambivalence −.05 −.001 .02 −.03

Baseline (N=98) Preparation (N=99) Speech (N=99) Rest (N=98)

Negative affect Security −.23** −.15 −.05 −.12
Avoidance .15 .10 −.15 −.001
Ambivalence .05 −.13 .11 −.08

Baseline (N=98) Preparation (N=99) Speech (N=95) Rest (N=95)

HF-HRV Security .21* .06 −.04 .13
Avoidance −.13 .001 −.14 −.04
Ambivalence −.07 .001 .26** −.13
*

p<.10,

**

p<.05