Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2017 May 4;101:153–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.004

Table 10.

Multiple regression model of reading comprehension score with double violation N400 and P600 as ERP predictors for the subset of deaf participants whose reading comprehension score was within the effective range of the hearing participants (scores above 80; n=24).

Block 1 R2change Fchange R2total R2Adj Ftotal
.19 1.60 .19 .07 1.60
(3,20) (3,20)
B (SE) β t p
    Years of Education 0.64 (1.49) 0.09 0.43 0.674
    NTID Speechreading Score 0.25 (0.21) 0.35 1.22 0.236
    Growing Up Language −0.53 (1.32) −0.11 −0.40 0.694
Block 2 R2change Fchange R2total R2Adj Ftotal
.18 2.58 .37 .20 2.14
(2,18) (5,18)
B (SE) β t p
    Years of Education 1.25 (1.43) 0.17 0.87 0.396
    NTID Speechreading Score 0.32 (0.20) 0.44 1.63 0.121
    Growing Up Language 0.06 (1.25) 0.01 0.05 0.963
    Double Violation N400 2.38 (1.06) 0.49 2.24 * 0.038
    Double Violation P600 0.72 (1.07) 0.15 0.07 0.510

B = unstandardized regression coefficient; β = standardized regression coefficient.

*

p < .05.