Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2017 May 4;101:153–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.004

Table 5.

Deaf participant multiple regression model of reading comprehension score with semantic violation N400 and grammatical violation P600 as ERP predictors.

Block 1 R2change Fchange R2total R2Adj Ftotal
.64 22.12 .64 .61 22.12
(3,38)*** (3,38)***

B (SE) β t p

    Years of Education 3.73 (1.07) 0.41 3.50 ** 0.001
    NTID Speechreading Score 0.47 (0.11) 0.53 4.10 *** <0.001
    Growing Up Language 0.81 (0.99) 0.09 0.82 0.419
Block 2 R2change Fchange R2total R2Adj Ftotal
.05 2.98 .69 .64 15.85
(2,36)^ (5,36)***

B (SE) β t p

    Years of Education 4.11 (1.03) 0.45 3.98 *** <0.001
    NTID Speechreading Score 0.44 (0.11) 0.51 4.03 *** <0.001
    Growing Up Language 0.22 (0.98) 0.03 0.23 0.821
    Semantic Violation N400 2.38 (0.98) 0.23 2.42 * 0.021
    Grammatical Violation P600 −0.29 (1.03) −0.03 −0.28 0.778

B = unstandardized regression coefficient; β = standardized regression coefficient

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.

^

p < 0.10