Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2017 May 25;93:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.008

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Participant & Subtype Gender Age Years of Education Months Post-onset
Anomic1 F 63 12 20
Anomic2 F 60 10 5
Anomic3 M 62 19 6
Anomic4 M 47 14 23
Anomic5 M 55 16 10
Broca1 M 48 14 11
Broca2 M 59 16 81
Broca3 M 58 18 109
Conduction1 F 73 14 15
Conduction2 M 53 12 61
TCM1 M 54 16 4
TCM2 F 73 12 24
Mean 58.8 14.4 30.8
Min; Max 47; 73 10; 19 4; 109

Participant & Subtype Aphasia Severity Naming Auditory Comprehension Word Comprehension
Anomic1 93 78 9.6 98
Anomic2 89 79 9.2 86
Anomic3 85 83 9.8 95
Anomic4 74 83 7.2 95
Anomic5 77 64 8.8 92
Broca1 65 55 8.8 98
Broca2 57 59 7.0 81
Broca3 56 78 6.4 96
Conduction1 83 65 9.1 90
Conduction2 71 70 8.2 98
TCM1 76 59 8.7 90
TCM2 73 77 8.7 94
Mean 74.8 70.8 8.5 92.8
Min; Max 56; 93 55; 83 6.4; 9.8 81; 98

Note. TCM = transcortical motor. Aphasia Severity = Aphasia Quotient from the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 2007). Naming = percent correct on the Philadelphia Naming Test (Roach et al., 1996). Auditory comprehension = comprehension subtest score from the Western Aphasia Battery (max score = 10). Word comprehension = score on the Philadelphia Name Verification Test (Mirman et al., 2010), reflecting the percentage of items for which the correct name was verified and semantic and phonological foils were rejected.