Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0182088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182088

Table 2. Overall and subgroup analyses of the association between use of ADs and incidence of diabetes.

Stratification Groups No. of studies Fixed effect model Random effect model I2 (%)
Overall studies 20 1.31 (1.28–1.33) 1.27 (1.19–1.35) 71
Type of antidepressant
SSRI 7 1.23 (1.15–1.31) 1.21 (1.07–1.37) 70
Non-SSRI 7 1.40 (1.32–1.48) 1.31 (1.16–1.47) 65
Country
USA 10 1.28 (1.23–1.34) 1.28 (1.16–1.43) 78
Non-USA 10 1.31 (1.29–1.34) 1.25 (1.13–1.39) 62
Type of study
Cohort 16 1.31 (1.28–1.33) 1.26 (1.17–1.35) 74
Nested Case Control 4 1.29 (1.18–1.42) 1.33 (1.12–1.58) 67
Source of information about AD treatment
Self-report 12 1.23 (1.17–1.29) 1.25 (1.14–1.37) 59
Prescriptions 8 1.32 (1.29–1.34) 1.28 (1.16–1.43) 78
Source of information about the diagnosis of diabetes
Self-report 9 1.23 (1.17–1.29) 1.23 (1.15–1.32) 34
Antidiabetics prescriptions or clinical diagnosis 11 1.32 (1.29–1.34) 1.29 (1.16–1.44) 79
Study Quality NOS <8 14 1.30 (1.28–1.33) 1.24 (1.15–1.33) 78
NOS 8–9 6 1.36 (1.24–1.49) 1.40 (1.24–1.57) 19
Adjustment for specific risk factors
BMI 11 1.22 (1.16–1.28) 1.21 (1.12–1.31) 54
Depression 13 1.30 (1.28–1.33) 1.25 (1.16–1.34) 68
BMI and depression 10 1.21 (1.16–1.27) 1.20 (1.10–1.30) 57