Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0164518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164518

Table 3. Results of the upwind flight (UF) and localization (L) generalized linear models.

Behavioral indicator Odor sources comparisons Genotype for the kdr mutation Odds Ratios [95% Confidence Interval] p-value
Upwind flight (UF) Rabbita vsno odorb SS 1.09 [0.87, 1.37] ns
RS 1.27 [0.91, 1.77] ns
RR 1.08 [0.85, 1.37] ns
Rabbit + ITNc vsRabbita SS 1.02 [0.85, 1.21] ns
RS 1.05 [0.82, 1.34] ns
RR 1.12 [0.94, 1.35] ns
Localization (L) Rabbit vs
no odorb
SS 2.63 [1.67, 4.15] ***
RS 1.96 [1.14, 3.36] *
RR 4.63 [2.67, 8.02] ***
Rabbit + ITNc vs
Rabbita
SS 1.3 [0.99, 1.69] ns
RS 1.01 [0.72, 1.42] ns
RR 1.01 [0.76, 1.33] ns

Comparison of mosquitoes’ progress first when the rabbit was added as an odor source (vs. no odor) and then when ITN was present (vs. rabbit alone).

a experiments 2 and 3

b experiment 1

c experiment 4 (see Table 1)

***p <0.001

**p≤ 0.01

*p≤0.05, ns: not significant. ITN: insecticide-treated net. SS: homozygous for the susceptible allele, RS: heterozygous, RR: homozygous for the resistant allele.