Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0182076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182076

Table 2. Background reproductive characteristics of follow-up respondents compared with married and sexually active unmarried women in three selected regions, GDHS 2014.

Percentage distribution of background characteristics within the following groups:
Family planning users in three study regions1 Follow-up family planning users2 Women with unmet need in three study regions1 Follow-up respondents with unmet need2
Marital Status
 Never in union 14 17 17 14
 Currently in union 83 76 80 84
 Formerly in union 4 7 4 2
Number of children ever born
 0 17 13 14 14
 1–2 31 41 34 20
 3–5 40 39 38 36
 6+ 12 7 14 30
Knowledge of family planning
 Knows no method 1 2
 Knows only traditional method 0 0 1 2
 Knows modern method 100 100 99 96
Unmet need
 Unmet need for spacing 69 62
 Unmet need for limiting 31 38
 Using for spacing 61 78
 Using for limiting 39 22
Ever use of family planning
 Ever 100 100 62 66
 Never 39 34
Abortion experience3
 Never had an abortion - 72 - 90
 Had an abortion once - 24 - 6
 Had an abortion more than once - 4 - 4
Total 100 100 100 100
Number of women 625 46 746 50

Note: Percentages may not sum to total due to rounding.

▪ Zero by definition or due to sampling criteria

1 National and regional estimates are weighted.

2 Follow-up respondents are shown unweighted for ease of comparison with case count tables.

3 Abortion not asked about in GDHS; results from follow-up study only