Table 3.
Relationship between baseline acetabular index (AI) value before reduction was undertaken and the McKay’s criteria achieved after treatment was complete (n = 339).
| AI value | Total hips | McKay’s hip function criteria |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Total ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ rate | ||
| 30°–35° | 106 | 73 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 91 (85.85)a |
| 36°–40° | 121 | 56 | 44 | 12 | 9 | 100 (82.64)a |
| > 40° | 112 | 40 | 41 | 15 | 16 | 81 (72.32) |
Data presented as n of hips (%).
a
Significant difference in the rate of McKay’s criteria of ‘excellent’ and ‘good’ compared with the > 40° group; χ2-test (P ≥ 0.05).