Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 7;44(6):1156–1173. doi: 10.1177/0300060516667132

Table 2.

Results from the subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis.

Characteristic Studies Case Control SMD (95% CI) Heterogeneity
P-Value
I2 (%) P-Value
All Studies 17 5575 6389 −3.41 (−4.01, −2.80) 99 <0.00001 <0.00001
Region
 Asia 8 2367 2495 −4.73 (−6.29, −3.17) 99 <0.00001 <0.00001
 Europe 5 987 964 −2.34 (−4.65, −0.04) 100 <0.00001 0.05
 USA 4 2221 2930 −2.94 (−3.97, −1.91) 99 <0.00001 <0.00001
Age
 > 60 years 7 4953 5783 −1.47 (−2.19, −0.76) 100 <0.00001 <0.0001
 < 60 years 10 622 606 −5.45 (−7.33, −3.57) 99 <0.00001 <0.00001
Type
 T1DM 3 102 104 −0.74 (−1.46, −0.03) 83 0.003 0.04
 T2DM 15 5473 6285 −3.98 (−4.65, −3.31) 99 <0.00001 <0.00001
BMI
 Normal 3 155 158 −3.28 (−5.06, −1.50) 97 <0.00001 0.0003
 Overweight 4 2095 2216 −1.69 (−2.82, −0.56) 98 <0.00001 0.003
 Obese 5 2448 3336 −1.12 (−1.75, −0.49) 99 <0.00001 0.0005
Gender
 Male 2 114 126 −7.46 (−19.49, 4.56) 100 <0.00001 0.22
 Female 1 1675 2380 −0.11 (−0.17, −0.05) 0.0007

Data originate from the same paper (Ref. 14). The same control group was used for each comparison (n = 80).

SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index.