. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 31.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Nov-Dec;29(6):694–701. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160079

Table 2.

Sensitivity and Specificity of TADA Algorithm for Malignant Study Lesions (Melanoma, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma) Achieved by Dermatologists Versus Non-Dermatologists, Participants with Previous Dermoscopy Training Versus Those Without, and Participants with Less Than or Equal to One Year of Dermoscopy Experience Versus Those with Greater than One Year of Experience

Variable	Coding	Participants/Observations	Sensitivity	95% CI		P	Specificity	95% CI		P
Variable	Coding	Participants/Observations	Sensitivity	Lower	Upper	P	Specificity	Lower	Upper	P
Profession	Dermatologist	64/2788	0.948	0.924	0.972	.374	0.785	0.702	0.844	.008
	Non-Dermatologist	49/2132	0.937	0.919	0.955		0.721	0.681	0.755
Previous dermoscopy training	Yes	63/2583	0.950	0.909	0.994	.13	0.764	0.669	0.831	.36
Previous dermoscopy training	No	52/2132	0.933	0.915	0.951		0.741	0.702	0.775
Years of experience in dermoscopy	> 1 year	62/2002	0.954	0.931	0.978	.05	0.773	0.683	0.837	.21
Years of experience in dermoscopy	≤ 1 year	52/2404	0.931	0.913	0.950		0.742	0.704	0.775

CI, confidence interval; TADA, Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm.