Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Immun. 2017 Apr 25;65:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.04.018

Table 2.

Summary of regression analyses relating mothers’ childhood disadvantage to birth outcomes, with inclusion of demographic covariates

Outcome b for trend SE ββ for
trend
Exp (B) p
Length of gestation a −0.16 .08 −.08 -- .042
Preterm birth b 0.26 .13 -- 1.29 .050
Birth weight percentile a −0.02 .01 −.08 -- .047
Small for gestational age b 0.26 .12 -- 1.30 .045
Length of hospital stay a 1.11 .32 .15 -- .001
Special care nursery b 0.20 .10 -- 1.22 .036

Note. Values reflect association between mothers’ childhood disadvantage and specified pregnancy outcome, adjusted for maternal age, and dummy variables reflecting Black race and Hispanic ethnicity.

a

Continuous outcome modeled in linear regression, where b and β denote the unstandardized and standardized coefficients, respectively.

b

Binary outcome modeled in logistic regression, where b and Exp (B) denote the unstandardized coefficient and odds ratio, respectively. P values are two-tailed. N’s = 666–671.