Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Apr 26;17(5):382–391. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.009

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of DFS and OS of MBC and TNBC

Characteristic DFS OS
HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
MBC vs. TNBC 1.99 (1.01–3.83) 0.05 1.50 (0.75–2.97) 0.250
T2 vs. T1 2.34 (1.44–3.94) 0.001 2.34 (1.41–3.88) 0.001
T3 vs. T1 2.07 (1.01–4.28) 0.048 2.52 (1.22–5.19) 0.012
T4 vs. T1 7.35 (1.96–27.56) 0.003 10.39 (2.88–37.51) <0.001
N (Positive vs. Negative) 3.53 (2.21–5.65) <0.001 2.80 (1.75–4.47) <0.001
Neoadjuvant, Yes vs. No 3.39 (2.01–5.74) <0.001 3.45 (2.07–5.75) <0.001
Radiation, No vs. Yes 2.19 (1.30–3.71) 0.003 2.17 (1.29–3.67) 0.004
Chemotherapy, No vs. Yes 1.84 (0.94–3.61) 0.076 1.67 (0.84–3.33) 0.144

MBC Metaplastic breast cancer, TNBC Triple negative breast cancer; DFS, disease free survival; OS, overall survival