Table 2.

Results reported by other research groups on their implemented methods for spine labeling

Work	Data	Detection rate [%]	Localization error [mm]	Labeling rate [%]
Huang et al. [15]	Cervical/lumbar MR	97.9/98.1	–	–
Klinder et al. [11]	Whole-spine and partial CT	92	–	95
Glocker et al. [18]	Whole-spine and partial CT	–	9.50	81
Glocker et al. [19]	Whole-spine and partial CT	–	7.0–14.3	62–86
Major et al. [13]	Disks in whole-spine CT	–	4.5	99.0
Oktay et al. [12]	Lumbar MR	–	2.95–3.25	97.8 (disks)
Lootus et al. [16]	Primarily lumbar MR	–	3.3	84.1
Cai et al. [17]	Whole-spine and partial CT/MR	–	2.08–3.44	93.8–98.2
Chen et al. [20]	Whole-spine and partial CT	–	8.82	84.16
Suzani et al. [21]	Whole-spine and partial CT	–	18.2	–
Zhan et al. [14]	Cervical/lumbar MR	98.0/98.8	3.07 (whole-spine)	–
Cai et al. [22]	Lumbar MR	–	3.23	98.1