Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 9;30(4):460–468. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9980-7

Table 2.

Comparison of models with augmentation and without augmentation for the ET presence/absence and ET low/normal datasets

ET tube presence/absence ET tube low/normal
AlexNet_T No Aug 0.771 (0.647–0.895) 0.763 (0.640–0.886)
AlexNet_T Aug 0.856 (0.758–0.954) 0.791 (0.672–0.910)
Significance P = 0.245 P = 0.487
GoogLeNet_T No Aug 0.636 (0.494–0.778) 0.713 (0.584–0.843)
GoogLeNet_T Aug 0.989 (0.970–1.000) 0.809 (0.697–0.921)
Significance P < 0.0001 P = 0.141
AlexNet_U No Aug 0.669 (0.531–0.807) 0.613 (0.461–0.766)
AlexNet_U with Aug 0.675 (0.537–0.813) 0.741 (0.612–0.870)
Significance P = 0.933 P = 0.063
GoogLeNet_U No Aug 0.491 (0.334–0.642) 0.657 (0.513–0.800)
GoogLeNet_U with Aug 0.650 (0.505–0.795) 0.748 (0.623–0.873)
Significance P = 0.216 P = 0.328

AUCs and corresponding P values are provided