Table 1. Protocols proposed for the reduction of either dose exposure or operator workload for quantitative or semi-quantitative lung aeration assessment in ARDS.
Method | Description | Irradiated portion of the chest | Number of slices used in the analysis | Validation | Estimated dose reduction | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retrospective extrapolation of slices (25) | Extrapolation of 10 equally spaced slices | Whole chest | 10 | Retrospective (157 critically ill patients, 41 ponies, 23 pigs, 11 sheep) | NA | No dose reduction |
Low dose spiral CT (26) | Spiral scans at 60 and 30 mAs | Whole chest | 30–40, 5 mm-slices | Prospective (45 patients with ARDS at two PEEP levels, 14 sheep) | −70% with 30 mAs | No reduction of number of slices |
Visual assessment (21) | Visual estimation of recruited lung tissue at two PEEP levels | Whole chest | 30–40, 5 mm-slices | Retrospective (50 patients with ARDS, scans performed at two PEEP levels) | NA | No dose reduction |
Ultra-low dose sequential CT (27) | Thin-slice sequential scan performed with 180 and 50 mAs | 1 mm portions interleaved by 20 mm of non-irradiated chest | 10–12, 1 mm-slices | Prospective (12 pigs), retrospective (32 critically ill patients) | −97% with 50 mAs | Longer acquisition time |
ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; CT, computed tomography; NA, not applicable.