Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;9(7):172. doi: 10.3390/v9070172

Table 3.

In vivo models for HDV infection.

Model Entry HBV Co-Infection Immuno-Competent Pros Cons Ref.
Chimpanzee + + + Immunocompetent infection model Ethical considerations [54,55,56]
Woodchuck +/- + 1 + Immunocompetent infection model Relies on WHV rather than HBV envelope [57,59,69]
HDV/HDAg-transgenic mice - - + Stable mouse lines; tissue-specific expression can be analyzed No virus infection/spread [60,61]
Hydrodynamic injection - - + Fast and easy way to deliver nucleic acids to the liver No virus infection/spread; harmful to the animal [62,63]
AAV-HDV transduction - - + Allows studies of host virus interactions in vivo No authentic infection system [70]
Liver-chimeric mice + + - Authentic HBV/HDV infection; allows for long-term infections No adaptive immunity; very sophisticated model [66,67]
hNTCP mice + - + Immunocompetent transgenic infection system Low infection rates, transient infection [64,65]
Macaque/pig hNTCP-transduced + + + Immunocompetent models allowing authentic infection Only in vitro data available so far; sophisticated animal models [15,71]

1 Co-infection only with WHV, not with HBV. WHV: Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus.