Table 3.
Model | Entry | HBV Co-Infection | Immuno-Competent | Pros | Cons | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chimpanzee | + | + | + | Immunocompetent infection model | Ethical considerations | [54,55,56] |
Woodchuck | +/- | + 1 | + | Immunocompetent infection model | Relies on WHV rather than HBV envelope | [57,59,69] |
HDV/HDAg-transgenic mice | - | - | + | Stable mouse lines; tissue-specific expression can be analyzed | No virus infection/spread | [60,61] |
Hydrodynamic injection | - | - | + | Fast and easy way to deliver nucleic acids to the liver | No virus infection/spread; harmful to the animal | [62,63] |
AAV-HDV transduction | - | - | + | Allows studies of host virus interactions in vivo | No authentic infection system | [70] |
Liver-chimeric mice | + | + | - | Authentic HBV/HDV infection; allows for long-term infections | No adaptive immunity; very sophisticated model | [66,67] |
hNTCP mice | + | - | + | Immunocompetent transgenic infection system | Low infection rates, transient infection | [64,65] |
Macaque/pig hNTCP-transduced | + | + | + | Immunocompetent models allowing authentic infection | Only in vitro data available so far; sophisticated animal models | [15,71] |
1 Co-infection only with WHV, not with HBV. WHV: Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus.