Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Oct;141(10):1190–1201. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0046

TABLE 4.

Prevalence of fluorosis on maxillary incisors (two or more teeth of four versus none) according to fluoride source: upper quartiles versus lower three quartiles.

INTAKE GROUP* FLUORIDE INTAKE SOURCE
NO. OF PARTICIPANTS PERCENTAGE PREVALENCE OF FLUOROSIS RELATIVE RISK (95% CI§) COMMON RELATIVE RISK (95% CI)
Ingested dentifrice (16–36 months) Other beverages with added water (3–9 months) Powdered formula (3–9 months)

1A Low/moderate Low/moderate Low/moderate 203 20.7 1.68 (1.11, 2.54) 1.40 (1.06,1.84)
1B Low/moderate Low/moderate High 72 34.7

2A Low/moderate High Low/moderate 67 38.8 1.01 (0.58, 1.75)
2B Low/moderate High High 28 39.3

3A High Low/moderate Low/moderate 82 35.4 1.62 (0.94, 2.77)
3B High Low/moderate High 14 57.1

4A High High Low/moderate 17 35.3 0.94 (0.31, 2.91)
4B High High High 9 33.3
*

Stratified according to intake of fluoride from powdered formula, dentifrice and other beverages with added water.

All fluoride intake sources are grouped by area-under-the-curve intake quartiles.

Includes nonformula beverages made from frozen concentrate or powder.

§

CI: Confidence interval.

Mantel-Haenszel relative risk. Result of the Breslow-Day test for homogeneity of odds ratios was not significant (P = .48). General association P value was .02.