Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Jun 28;19(25):16806–16818. doi: 10.1039/c7cp01921a

Table 4.

Experimentally determined bilayer bending moduli from Figure 2 expressed as a percent difference from the simulation values, KC%=100×(KCexp-KCsim)/KCsim, and the corresponding literature references.

Bilayer Flicker Pipette Asp. ED X-ray NSE
KC% T Ref. KC% T Ref. KC% T Ref. KC% T Ref. KC% T Ref.
POPC 57 25 [12] −76
−44
22
24
[14]
[73]
−19 30 [66] −23 22 [19]
DLPC −34 24 [74] −77 22 [14] −63 30 [68]
DPPC 0 50 [74] −56 50 [75] −71 60 [18]
SOPC 17
17
2
24
24
24
[9]
[76]
[76]
17
44
18
25
[11]
[13]
−70 21 [73] −17 30 [69]
DOPC 42 23 [15] 15 18 [11] 20
−18
−78
23
23
21
[15]
[73]
[73]
2 30 [71]
DEPC 7 18 [11]
TOCL 25 30 [52]
DMPC −11 30 [74] −63 29 [11] −51 30 [68] −60 28 [18]
DLiPC −33 18 [11]

Shown also are the respective temperatures (T) of the experimental measurements in units of Celsius. Note that in the calculation all experimental values have been rounded from those reported in the original publications. The different techniques are designated as follows: Flicker – flicker spectroscopy; Pipette Asp. – pipette aspiration; ED – electrodeformation; X-ray – low angle diffuse X-ray scattering; NSE – neutron spin-echo.