Table 2.
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
entry | donor | acceptor (equiv) | photolysistime (h) | product | yield, %a α:β-ratiob |
1 |
6α |
11 (3) |
36 |
14 |
80, 1.3:1 |
2 | 6α |
12 (1.5) |
48 |
15 |
62, 1.5:1 |
3 | 6α |
13 (1.5) |
60 |
16 |
64, 1:1 |
4 |
7α |
11 (3) | 36 |
17 |
96, 1:2.5 |
5 |
7β |
11 (5) | 36 | 17 | 91, 1.2:1 |
6 | 7α | 12 (1.5) | 48 |
18 |
88, 1:1 |
7 | 7β | 12 (1.5) | 48 | 18 | 79, 1.3:1 |
8 | 7α | 13 (1.5) | 48 |
19 |
69, 1.3:1 |
9 | 7β | 13 (1.5) | 48 | 19 | 63, 1.6:1 |
10 |
8α |
11 (3) | 36 |
20 |
95, 1:1.6 |
11 |
8β |
11 (3) | 36 | 20 | 87, 1.6:1 |
12 | 8α | 12 (1.5) | 48 |
21 |
82, 1.2:1 |
13 | 8β | 12 (1.5) | 48 | 21 | 75, 1.4:1 |
14 | 8α | 13 (1.5) | 48 |
22 |
77, 1.6:1 |
15 | 8β | 13 (1.5) | 48 | 22 | 59, 1.6:1 |
16 |
9β |
11 (3) | 36 |
23 |
86, 1.8:1 |
17 | 9β | 12 (1.5) | 72 |
24 |
61, 1.4:1 |
18 | 9β | 13 (1.5) | 60 |
25 |
57, 2:1 |
Combined yield of the isolated anomers.
Anomeric ratios were determined by integration of the 1H NMR spectra of the crude photolysates before purification