Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;123(1):136–146. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00804.2016

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Left: the regression of the LogSDV̇ derived from MRI compared with that from MIGET. The two measures were well correlated (R = 0.83, P = 0.02). Dotted line is the line of identity, gray lines are the 95% confidence limits for the relationship. The slope of the relationship was significantly different from the line of identity (P = 0.01) and the intercept was also significantly different from zero (P = 0.02). Right: the corresponding Bland-Altman plot. Dotted lines are the 95% confidence limits. The average bias between techniques was −0.01.