Skip to main content
. 2017 May 5;313(1):H114–H124. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00014.2017

Table 3.

Single-exponential phase II on-transient pulmonary V̇o2 kinetics parameter responses for both heart failure patients and age-matched healthy control subjects

Healthy Control Subjects
Heart Failure Patients
Parameter PLB FNT ES PLB FNT ES P Value
YB, l/min 0.3 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.1 0.00 0.4 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 0.1 0.00 0.12
Model 1
    A1, l/min 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 0.00 1.1 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 0.00 0.56
    A1 g, ml·min−1·W−1 11 ± 1 11 ± 1 0.00 14 ± 6 13 ± 4 0.27 0.07
    τ1, s 46 ± 5c 51 ± 8c 1.00 62 ± 12a 57 ± 12 0.66 0.06
    TD1, s 13 ± 4c 9 ± 5d 1.33 5 ± 7 8 ± 13c 0.35 0.30
Model 2
    A1, l/min 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 0.00 1.1 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 0.00 0.59
    A1 g, ml·min−1·W−1 11 ± 1 11 ± 1 0.00 14 ± 5 13 ± 4 0.33 0.07
    τ1, s 41 ± 5 42 ± 12 0.12 60 ± 13a 50 ± 14a,e 1.16 <0.01
    TD1, s −1 ± 5e −3 ± 5e 0.63 −4 ± 11 −10 ± 11 0.86 0.76
Model 3
    A1, l/min 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 0.00 1.1 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 0.00 0.61
    A1 g, ml·min−1·W−1 11 ± 1 11 ± 1 0.00 14 ± 4 13 ± 4 0.40 0.08
    τ1, s 39 ± 6 43 ± 11 0.70 57 ± 14a 45 ± 11b,e 1.43 <0.01
    TD1, s −8 ± 6 −13 ± 6 1.32 −3 ± 15 −5 ± 10 0.22 0.18

Data are expressed as means ± SD. Models 1−3 are single-exponential functions demonstrating phase II on-transient pulmonary V̇o2 kinetics parameters reflecting phase I period durations set at 15, 25, and 35 s, respectively. ES, effect size (Cohen’s d) between condition within group, interpreted as follows: 0.0, trivial; 0.2, small; 0.5, moderate; and ≥0.8, large. YB, resting pulmonary V̇o2; A1, steady-state increase in pulmonary V̇o2 above rest; A1 g, functional gain; τ1, time constant; TD1, time delay. P values reflect an overall group-by-condition effect for the respective on-kinetics parameters for models 1−3.

a

P < 0.05, between group per experimental arm, following Tukey post hoc testing.

b

P < 0.05, PLB vs. FNT within the heart failure group, following Tukey post hoc testing.

c

P < 0.05, within group, model 1 vs. models 2 and 3, following Tukey post hoc testing.

d

P < 0.05, within group, model 1 vs. model 3, following Tukey post hoc testing.

e

P < 0.05, within group, model 2 vs. model 3, following Tukey post hoc testing.