Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2016 Oct 19;429(3):372–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.10.019

Table 1.

Comparing the performance of the three servers.

Set Property PISA EPPIC ClusPro
Training set
Dimers: 120 Dimer correct 111 (92.5 %) 111 (92.5 %) 110 (91.7%)
Monomers: 89 Monomer correct 41 (46.1%) 68 (76.4%) 71 (79.8%)
Total: 209 Total correct 152 (72.7%) 179 (85.6%) 181 (86.6%)
Sensitivity & Specificity 0.93 & 0.46 0.93 & 0.76 0.92 & 0.80
F1 value 0.80 0.88 0.89
DC set
DC Bio: 63 Dimer correct 42 (66.7%) 59 (93.7%) 58 (92.1%)
DC Xtal: 78 Monomer correct 42 (53.8%) 51 (65.4%) 47 (60.3%)
Total: 141 Total correct 84 (59.6%) 110 (78.0%) 105 (74.5%)
Sensitivity & Specificity 0.67& 0.54 0.94 & 0.65 0.92 & 0.60
F1 value 0.60 0.79 0.76
Test set
Dimers: 293 Dimer correct 208 (69.8%) 223 (74.8%) 223 (74.8%)
Monomers: 490 Monomer correct 378 (77.1%) 385 (78.6%) 395 (80.6%)
Total: 783 Total correct 586 (74.8%) 608 (77.7%) 618 (78.9%)
Sensitivity & Specificity 0.71 & 0.77 0.76 & 0.79 0.76 & 0.81
F1 value 0.68 0.72 0.73
“Difficult” subset
Dimers: 56 Dimer correct 34 (60.7%) 15 (26.8%) 31 (55.4%)
Monomers: 86 Monomer correct 31 (36.0%) 39 (45.3%) 55 (64.0%)
Total: 142 Total correct 65 (45.8%) 54 (38.0%) 86 (60.6%)
Sensitivity & Specificity 0.61 & 0.36 0.27 & 0.45 0.55 & 0.64
F1 value 0.47 0.25 0.53