Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb 1;28(9):1377–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3279-6

Structural Equation Modeling Showing the Relationships Between BMI and Measures of Urethral Function, Urethrovaginal Support, and Stress Urinary Incontinence. *Standardized values used for analyses

Direct, Indirect and Total Effects:

Direct effect of BMI on Stress Incontinence (f)=0.209 (SE=0.064), p=.001

Indirect effect of BMI on Stress Incontinence through Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure (d & e)=0.056 (SE=0.048), p=.243 Indirect effect of BMI on Stress Incontinence through POP-Q Point Aa (f & h)=0.021 (SE=0.026), p=.410

Total effect of BMI on Stress Incontinence (d & e & g & h & f)=0.286 (SE=0.091), p=.002

Fit Indices:

Chi(1)=0.012, p=0.913; RMSEA <.001 (90% CI: <.001, .073); CFI 1.000